monday.com vs Hive
Compare Hive and monday.com on starting price, seat minimums, free plans, timelines, automations, integrations, and reporting. There is no universal winner — choose by job-cluster fit.
Hive
Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.
Best for
- • SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
- • Buyers comparing monday who want a lower paid floor
Starting from $5.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
Choose monday.com when mainstream Work OS breadth, ecosystem depth and brand default matter (overall 8.6); choose Hive when a lower paid entry and generous Free (≤10) matter more (overall 7.6). Both are work-OS peers — not timeline specialists or adjacent PDF/remote tools.
Hive is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Seat / licence minimum
- ✓ Free plan
- ✓ Value for money
monday.com is better for
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Work planning depth
- ✓ Automation & workflows
Tie
- • Timeline / Gantt
Choose Hive if: SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
Choose monday.com if: Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
monday.com
Work OS / work management platform with boards, timelines, automations and AI credits — Basic from $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum).
Best for
- • Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
- • Buyers who need deep integrations and timeline/workload views
Starting from $9.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Hive vs monday.com at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingHive
Hive
monday.com
- Seat / licence minimumHive
Hive
monday.com
- Free planHive
Hive
monday.com
- Timeline / GanttTie
Hive
monday.com
- Automationsmonday.com
Hive
monday.com
Which project management is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Hive
Best for starting pricing
monday.com Basic $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum) plus AI credit bundles; Hive Starter $5/user/mo annual (≤10) or Teams $12 unlimited. Hive undercuts monday’s paid floor for small teams.
- → Hive
Best for seat / licence minimum
monday.com paid plans enforce a 3-seat minimum; Free is ≤2 seats. Hive Free/Starter allow up to 10 members before Teams unlimited — friendlier for micro teams.
- → Hive
Best for free plan
Both publish free plans. monday.com Free: ≤2 seats, ≤3 boards. Hive Free: ≤10 members with storage/AI credit caps.
- → monday.com
Best for automations
Both ship native automations/workflows. monday.com is the broader published Work OS automation narrative; Hive pairs automations with optional ~$5 add-ons.
- → monday.com
Best for ease of use
monday.com leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.
- → monday.com
Best for work planning depth
monday.com leads on work planning depth (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
Hive winsHive
monday.com Basic $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum) plus AI credit bundles; Hive Starter $5/user/mo annual (≤10) or Teams $12 unlimited. Hive undercuts monday’s paid floor for small teams.
monday.com
Trails Hive on this criterion
Seat / licence minimum
Hive winsHive
monday.com paid plans enforce a 3-seat minimum; Free is ≤2 seats. Hive Free/Starter allow up to 10 members before Teams unlimited — friendlier for micro teams.
monday.com
Trails Hive on this criterion
Timeline / Gantt
TieHive
Both support timeline/Gantt-style planning on work-management plans. monday.com markets timeline + workload views heavily; Hive covers Gantt/timeline inside projects.
monday.com
Both support timeline/Gantt-style planning on work-management plans. monday.com markets timeline + workload views heavily; Hive covers Gantt/timeline inside projects.
Work planning depth
monday.com winsHive
Trails monday.com on this criterion
monday.com
monday.com leads on work planning depth (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.
Automations
monday.com winsHive
Trails monday.com on this criterion
monday.com
Both ship native automations/workflows. monday.com is the broader published Work OS automation narrative; Hive pairs automations with optional ~$5 add-ons.
Integrations
monday.com winsHive
Trails monday.com on this criterion
monday.com
monday.com leads on integrations (7/10 vs 9/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.
Which should you choose?
Choose Hive if
- SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
- Buyers comparing monday who want a lower paid floor
Choose monday.com if
- Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
- Buyers who need deep integrations and timeline/workload views
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider
Office Timeline
PowerPoint-native timeline / Gantt specialist (now Lucen Timeline) — Free add-in; Lite from $9/user/mo annual.
Asana
Cross-functional work management with goals, workflows and AI Studio — Starter from $10.99/user/mo annual.
ClickUp
All-in-one configurable Work OS (tasks, docs, dashboards, ClickUp Brain) — Unlimited from $7/user/mo annual.
Wrike
Enterprise/agency work management with proofing, intake and resourcing — Team from $10/user/mo annual.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Hive and monday.com?
Use Best project management software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.