SoftwareGlimpse

Grasshopper vs Ooma

Compare Grasshopper and Ooma on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources8 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Grasshopper logo

Grasshopper

6.2/10

SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).

Best for

  • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
  • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
  • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line

Starting from $14.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Grasshopper and Ooma. Choose Grasshopper when Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number. Choose Ooma when Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Grasshopper is better for

  • AI features

Ooma is better for

  • Power dialer
  • CRM / CTI integrations
  • Routing & IVR
  • Analytics

Tie

  • Number / country coverage
  • WhatsApp Business

Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number

Choose Ooma if: Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts

See detailed comparison ↓
Ooma logo

Ooma

6.6/10

SMB VoIP (Ooma Office) — Essentials from $19.95/user/mo monthly; Pro $24.95; Pro Plus $29.95 — no annual lock-in.

Best for

  • Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts
  • Teams under ~15 seats needing receptionist, ring groups and optional queues
  • Buyers who prefer published Office seat floors over quote-only UCaaS

Starting from $19.95/user/mo

No free plan

Grasshopper vs Ooma at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Grasshopper

    Ooma

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Grasshopper

    Ooma

  • Number / country coverageTie

    Grasshopper

    Ooma

  • Power dialerOoma

    Grasshopper

    Ooma

  • WhatsApp BusinessTie

    Grasshopper

    Ooma

Which business communications is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Grasshopper

    Best for ai features

    Grasshopper leads on ai features (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Ooma

    Best for power dialer

    Ooma leads on power dialer (4/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Ooma

    Best for crm / cti integrations

    Ooma leads on crm integrations (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Ooma

    Best for routing & ivr

    Ooma leads on routing (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Grasshopper

    Grasshopper researched starting price from $14/mo; Ooma researched starting price from $19.95/mo. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.

    Ooma

    Grasshopper researched starting price from $14/mo; Ooma researched starting price from $19.95/mo. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.

  • WhatsApp Business

    Tie

    Grasshopper

    Grasshopper and Ooma have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Grasshopper: not-supported; Ooma: not-supported).

    Ooma

    Grasshopper and Ooma have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Grasshopper: not-supported; Ooma: not-supported).

  • Power dialer

    Ooma wins

    Grasshopper

    Trails Ooma on this criterion

    Ooma

    Ooma leads on power dialer (4/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Routing & IVR

    Ooma wins

    Grasshopper

    Trails Ooma on this criterion

    Ooma

    Ooma leads on routing (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • CRM / CTI integrations

    Ooma wins

    Grasshopper

    Trails Ooma on this criterion

    Ooma

    Ooma leads on crm integrations (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Grasshopper if

  • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
  • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
  • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line

Choose Ooma if

  • Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts
  • Teams under ~15 seats needing receptionist, ring groups and optional queues
  • Buyers who prefer published Office seat floors over quote-only UCaaS

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Grasshopper and Ooma?

Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.