Grasshopper vs Ooma
Compare Grasshopper and Ooma on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Grasshopper
SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).
Best for
- • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Starting from $14.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Grasshopper and Ooma. Choose Grasshopper when Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number. Choose Ooma when Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Grasshopper is better for
- ✓ AI features
Ooma is better for
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ CRM / CTI integrations
- ✓ Routing & IVR
- ✓ Analytics
Tie
- • Number / country coverage
- • WhatsApp Business
Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
Choose Ooma if: Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts

Ooma
SMB VoIP (Ooma Office) — Essentials from $19.95/user/mo monthly; Pro $24.95; Pro Plus $29.95 — no annual lock-in.
Best for
- • Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts
- • Teams under ~15 seats needing receptionist, ring groups and optional queues
- • Buyers who prefer published Office seat floors over quote-only UCaaS
Starting from $19.95/user/mo
No free plan
Grasshopper vs Ooma at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingDepends
Grasshopper
Ooma
- User / licence minimumDepends
Grasshopper
Ooma
- Number / country coverageTie
Grasshopper
Ooma
- Power dialerOoma
Grasshopper
Ooma
- WhatsApp BusinessTie
Grasshopper
Ooma
Which business communications is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Grasshopper
Best for ai features
Grasshopper leads on ai features (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Ooma
Best for power dialer
Ooma leads on power dialer (4/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Ooma
Best for crm / cti integrations
Ooma leads on crm integrations (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Ooma
Best for routing & ivr
Ooma leads on routing (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
DependsGrasshopper
Grasshopper researched starting price from $14/mo; Ooma researched starting price from $19.95/mo. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.
Ooma
Grasshopper researched starting price from $14/mo; Ooma researched starting price from $19.95/mo. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.
WhatsApp Business
TieGrasshopper
Grasshopper and Ooma have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Grasshopper: not-supported; Ooma: not-supported).
Ooma
Grasshopper and Ooma have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Grasshopper: not-supported; Ooma: not-supported).
Power dialer
Ooma winsGrasshopper
Trails Ooma on this criterion
Ooma
Ooma leads on power dialer (4/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Routing & IVR
Ooma winsGrasshopper
Trails Ooma on this criterion
Ooma
Ooma leads on routing (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
CRM / CTI integrations
Ooma winsGrasshopper
Trails Ooma on this criterion
Ooma
Ooma leads on crm integrations (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Which should you choose?
Choose Grasshopper if
- Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Choose Ooma if
- Small businesses that want transparent monthly VoIP without annual contracts
- Teams under ~15 seats needing receptionist, ring groups and optional queues
- Buyers who prefer published Office seat floors over quote-only UCaaS
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider

OpenPhone
Modern SMB shared business phone (also branded Quo) with shared numbers, SMS and Sona AI — Starter from $15/user/month annual.

CallHippo
SMB cloud phone system with a $0 starter rung, Starter from $18/user/month annual (2-user minimum), call recording and IVR from Professional, plus a separate call-centre plan ladder.

Nextiva
SMB-friendly unified business communications — Core $15, Engage $25, Scale $75 per user/month annual, with messaging apps including WhatsApp and a Contact Center ladder from $75/agent.

KrispCall
Budget global cloud telephony with virtual numbers across 100+ countries and a unified callbox — Essential from $12/user/month annual (up to 5 users); calls and SMS are pay-as-you-go.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Grasshopper and Ooma?
Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.