SoftwareGlimpse

CallHippo vs Grasshopper

Compare CallHippo and Grasshopper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20266 evidence sources8 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Stronger overall fit
CallHippo logo

CallHippo

7.2/10

SMB cloud phone system with a $0 starter rung, Starter from $18/user/month annual (2-user minimum), call recording and IVR from Professional, plus a separate call-centre plan ladder.

Best for

  • SMB teams needing IVR, recording and CRM logging
  • Buyers who want WhatsApp alongside calling

Starting from $18.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

CallHippo is the stronger overall fit

Different jobs under the SMB phone umbrella. Grasshopper wins for the simplest affordable virtual business number; CallHippo wins when you need a real SMB phone system with IVR, recording, CRM logging and optional WhatsApp. Do not treat Grasshopper as a CallHippo feature peer.

CallHippo is better for

  • Power dialer
  • WhatsApp Business
  • CRM / CTI integrations
  • Routing & IVR

Tie

  • Number / country coverage
  • AI features

Choose CallHippo if: SMB teams needing IVR, recording and CRM logging

Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators who mainly need a professional virtual number

See detailed comparison ↓
Grasshopper logo

Grasshopper

6.2/10

SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).

Best for

  • Solo operators who mainly need a professional virtual number
  • Buyers who want flat account pricing instead of per-seat maths

Starting from $14.00/user/mo

No free plan

CallHippo vs Grasshopper at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper

  • Number / country coverageTie

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper

  • Power dialerCallHippo

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper

  • WhatsApp BusinessCallHippo

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper

Which business communications is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • CallHippo

    Best for power dialer

    Stronger power dialer availability

  • CallHippo

    Best for whatsapp business

    Stronger whatsapp business availability

  • CallHippo

    Best for crm / cti integrations

    CallHippo leads on crm-integrations (7/10 vs 5/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    CallHippo

    Grasshopper True Solo ~$14/month annual flat account (medium); Solo Plus ~$25; Small Business ~$55. CallHippo Starter $18/user/month annual with a $0 Basic rung. Grasshopper can be cheaper for a solo virtual number; CallHippo is per-seat once the team grows.

    Grasshopper

    Grasshopper True Solo ~$14/month annual flat account (medium); Solo Plus ~$25; Small Business ~$55. CallHippo Starter $18/user/month annual with a $0 Basic rung. Grasshopper can be cheaper for a solo virtual number; CallHippo is per-seat once the team grows.

  • WhatsApp Business

    CallHippo wins

    CallHippo

    Stronger whatsapp business availability

    Grasshopper

    Trails CallHippo on this criterion

  • Power dialer

    CallHippo wins

    CallHippo

    Stronger power dialer availability

    Grasshopper

    Trails CallHippo on this criterion

  • Routing & IVR

    CallHippo wins

    CallHippo

    CallHippo leads on routing (7/10 vs 6/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

    Grasshopper

    Trails CallHippo on this criterion

  • CRM / CTI integrations

    CallHippo wins

    CallHippo

    CallHippo leads on crm-integrations (7/10 vs 5/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

    Grasshopper

    Trails CallHippo on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose CallHippo if

  • SMB teams needing IVR, recording and CRM logging
  • Buyers who want WhatsApp alongside calling

Choose Grasshopper if

  • Solo operators who mainly need a professional virtual number
  • Buyers who want flat account pricing instead of per-seat maths

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between CallHippo and Grasshopper?

Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.