SoftwareGlimpse

Constant Contact vs Mailchimp

Compare Constant Contact and Mailchimp on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20267 evidence sources7 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

6.5/10

SMB and local-business email marketing with event tools and brand recognition across North America.

Best for

  • Local SMBs and events
  • NA brand-familiar paid entry

Starting from $12.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Mailchimp is the stronger overall fit

Choose Mailchimp for freemium brand-familiar beginners; choose Constant Contact for local SMB/event-oriented email with Lite entry.

Constant Contact is better for

  • Templates
  • Landing pages

Mailchimp is better for

  • Segmentation
  • Integrations
  • AI features

Tie

  • Automation
  • Analytics

Choose Constant Contact if: Local SMBs and events

Choose Mailchimp if: Beginners wanting freemium brand recognition

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
Mailchimp logo

Mailchimp

6.8/10

Email marketing with CRM features; freemium entry (secondary category: marketing).

Best for

  • Beginners wanting freemium brand recognition

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Constant Contact vs Mailchimp at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailchimp

  • Contact / subscriber limitsDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailchimp

  • Email send limitsDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailchimp

  • AutomationTie

    Constant Contact

    Mailchimp

  • TemplatesConstant Contact

    Constant Contact

    Mailchimp

Which email marketing is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Constant Contact

    Best for templates

    Stronger coverage across email templates.

  • Constant Contact

    Best for landing pages

    Stronger coverage across landing pages.

  • Mailchimp

    Best for segmentation

    Mailchimp leads on segmentation (6/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Mailchimp

    Best for integrations

    Stronger coverage across integrations, forms, email sync.

  • Mailchimp

    Best for ai features

    Mailchimp leads on ai-features (5/10 vs 6/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact Lite from $12/mo at ≤500 contacts (no free plan). Mailchimp freemium Free for eligible audiences; paid contact-based — verify live.

    Mailchimp

    Constant Contact Lite from $12/mo at ≤500 contacts (no free plan). Mailchimp freemium Free for eligible audiences; paid contact-based — verify live.

  • Automation

    Tie

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact and Mailchimp are close on automation (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

    Mailchimp

    Constant Contact and Mailchimp are close on automation (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Segmentation

    Mailchimp wins

    Constant Contact

    Trails Mailchimp on this criterion

    Mailchimp

    Mailchimp leads on segmentation (6/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Analytics

    Tie

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact and Mailchimp are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

    Mailchimp

    Constant Contact and Mailchimp are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Templates

    Constant Contact wins

    Constant Contact

    Stronger coverage across email templates.

    Mailchimp

    Trails Constant Contact on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Constant Contact if

  • Local SMBs and events
  • NA brand-familiar paid entry

Choose Mailchimp if

  • Beginners wanting freemium brand recognition

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Constant Contact and Mailchimp?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.