SoftwareGlimpse

Campaign Monitor vs Constant Contact

Campaign Monitor fits brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates; Constant Contact fits local smbs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

7/10

Design-led email marketing by Marigold with contact-tier Lite, Essentials, Premier, and Enterprise.

Best for

  • • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

No free plan

Visit Campaign Monitor
Read review

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact. Choose Campaign Monitor when Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates. Choose Constant Contact when Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Campaign Monitor is better for

  • ✓ Templates
  • ✓ Segmentation
  • ✓ AI features

Constant Contact is better for

  • ✓ Automation

Tie

  • • Landing pages
  • • Analytics
  • • Integrations

Choose Campaign Monitor if: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates

Choose Constant Contact if: Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing

See detailed comparison ↓
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

6.5/10

SMB and local-business email marketing with event tools and brand recognition across North America.

Best for

  • • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

Starting from $12.00/user/mo

No free plan

Visit Constant Contact
Read review

Quick verdict

Start here — then dig into the evidence below.

Choose Campaign Monitor if…

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights
  • You prioritize templates

Choose Constant Contact if…

  • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition
  • You prioritize automation

Overall recommendation

There is no universal winner between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact. Choose Campaign Monitor when Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates. Choose Constant Contact when Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Key trade-off

Campaign Monitor trades toward templates; Constant Contact trades toward automation.

Winner by category

Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.

DimensionWinnerWhy
AutomationConstant Contact winsConstant Contact leads on automation (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
TemplatesCampaign Monitor winsCampaign Monitor leads on templates (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
SegmentationCampaign Monitor winsCampaign Monitor leads on segmentation (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Landing pagesTieCampaign Monitor and Constant Contact have the same researched availability on landing pages (Campaign Monitor: limited; Constant Contact: limited).
ReportingTieCampaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
IntegrationsTieCampaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
AI featuresCampaign Monitor winsCampaign Monitor leads on ai features (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Side-by-side feature matrix

Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.

Campaigns

FeatureCampaign MonitorConstant Contact
Email campaignsStrongStrong
Newsletter builderStrongStrong
Email templatesStrongStrong
Drag-and-drop editorStrongStrong
Landing pagesModerateModerate
FormsModerateStrong

Automation & targeting

FeatureCampaign MonitorConstant Contact
Automation workflowsStrongStrong
SegmentationStrongStrong
PersonalizationStrongStrong
A/B testingStrongStrong
Transactional emailModerateModerate

Platform

FeatureCampaign MonitorConstant Contact
AnalyticsStrongStrong
Deliverability toolsStrongStrong
AI content generationStrongModerate

Additional capabilities

FeatureCampaign MonitorConstant Contact
Contact managementStrongStrong

Pricing comparison

Pricing evidence last checked Sep 8, 2026.

Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

From $13.00/user/mo

No free planFree trial available
  • Lite$13.00/mo
  • Essentials$31.00/mo
  • Premier$171.00/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

From $12.00/user/mo

No free planFree trial available
  • Lite$12.00/mo
  • Standard$35.00/mo
  • Premium$80.00/mo

Seat-count estimates

Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.

SeatsCampaign MonitorConstant Contact
5~$65.00/mo (5 × starting seat)~$60.00/mo (5 × starting seat)
10~$130.00/mo (10 × starting seat)~$120.00/mo (10 × starting seat)
25~$325.00/mo (25 × starting seat)~$300.00/mo (25 × starting seat)
50~$650.00/mo (50 × starting seat)~$600.00/mo (50 × starting seat)

Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.

Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo. Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo. Affiliate economics excluded.

Open cost calculator →

Best for

Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.

  • → Campaign Monitor

    Best for templates

    Campaign Monitor leads on templates (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • → Campaign Monitor

    Best for segmentation

    Campaign Monitor leads on segmentation (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • → Campaign Monitor

    Best for ai features

    Campaign Monitor leads on ai features (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • → Constant Contact

    Best for automation

    Constant Contact leads on automation (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The differences that actually matter

Pair-specific analysis for Campaign Monitor vs Constant Contact — not generic category copy.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Starting pricing: Campaign Monitor — Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.. Constant Contact — Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.. Feature evidence also diverges on Forms (Campaign Monitor: Moderate; Constant Contact: Strong); AI content generation (Campaign Monitor: Strong; Constant Contact: Moderate).

  • Automation

    Constant Contact ahead

    On automation, Constant Contact is ahead. Campaign Monitor: Trails Constant Contact on this criterion. Constant Contact: Constant Contact leads on automation (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing..

  • Segmentation

    Campaign Monitor ahead

    On segmentation, Campaign Monitor is ahead. Campaign Monitor: Campaign Monitor leads on segmentation (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.. Constant Contact: Trails Campaign Monitor on this criterion.

  • Analytics

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on analytics. Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Templates

    Campaign Monitor ahead

    On templates, Campaign Monitor is ahead. Campaign Monitor: Campaign Monitor leads on templates (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.. Constant Contact: Trails Campaign Monitor on this criterion.

Pros and cons

Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.

Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

Pros

  • Stronger on templates
  • Stronger on segmentation
  • Stronger on ai features

Cons

  • Trails on automation
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

Pros

  • Stronger on automation

Cons

  • Trails on templates
  • Trails on segmentation
  • Trails on ai features

Who should not choose each product

Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.

Don't choose Campaign Monitor if…

  • You need Constant Contact's stronger automation more than Campaign Monitor's strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Teams running events alongside email campaigns

Don't choose Constant Contact if…

  • You need Campaign Monitor's stronger templates more than Constant Contact's strengths
  • You need Campaign Monitor's stronger segmentation more than Constant Contact's strengths
  • You need Campaign Monitor's stronger ai features more than Constant Contact's strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates

Alternatives worth considering

When neither product is the right fit.

  • Mailchimp logoMailchimp

    Email marketing with CRM features; freemium entry (secondary category: marketing).

  • GetResponse logoGetResponse

    GetResponse is an AI-driven email marketing and lifecycle automation platform with newsletters, automation workflows, landing pages, funnels, webinars (higher plans), and ecommerce tools. Paid plans use contact-list tiers with unlimited monthly email sends; a forever-free plan an

  • AWeber logoAWeber

    Creator- and SMB-focused email marketing with free forever, Lite/Plus tiers, and landing pages.

  • ActiveCampaign logoActiveCampaign

    Email marketing automation ESP with multi-step journeys; CRM pipelines strongest on Plus+; contact-based pricing.

Final verdict

Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.

Campaign Monitor wins when…

Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates

Constant Contact wins when…

Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing

  • Best for templatesCampaign Monitor
  • Best for segmentationCampaign Monitor
  • Best for ai featuresCampaign Monitor
  • Best for automationConstant Contact

Which one should you choose?

Choose Campaign Monitor if:

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Choose Constant Contact if:

  • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

Product screenshots

Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.

Campaign Monitor

  • Email builder UI from official Campaign Monitor homepage.
  • Template builder UI from official Campaign Monitor features page.
  • Reporting UI from official Campaign Monitor site.
  • Automation product visual from official Campaign Monitor homepage.

FAQ

Is Campaign Monitor better than Constant Contact?
There is no universal winner between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact. Choose Campaign Monitor when Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates. Choose Constant Contact when Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Which email marketing fits which team?
Campaign Monitor: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates Constant Contact: Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
Does Campaign Monitor or Constant Contact have a free plan?
Campaign Monitor: No free plan. Constant Contact: No free plan.
How does Campaign Monitor vs Constant Contact pricing compare?
Campaign Monitor starts from $13.00/user/mo. Constant Contact starts from $12.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.

Still deciding between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

Best email marketing softwareCompare another
  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.

Part of Software comparisons · Email Marketing Software hub

Try a decision tool

Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.