SoftwareGlimpse

Campaign Monitor vs Constant Contact

Compare Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20265 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

7/10

Design-led email marketing by Marigold with contact-tier Lite, Essentials, Premier, and Enterprise.

Best for

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact. Choose Campaign Monitor when Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates. Choose Constant Contact when Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Campaign Monitor is better for

  • Templates
  • Segmentation
  • AI features

Constant Contact is better for

  • Automation

Tie

  • Landing pages
  • Analytics
  • Integrations

Choose Campaign Monitor if: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates

Choose Constant Contact if: Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing

See detailed comparison ↓
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

6.5/10

SMB and local-business email marketing with event tools and brand recognition across North America.

Best for

  • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

Starting from $12.00/user/mo

No free plan

Campaign Monitor vs Constant Contact at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Constant Contact

  • Contact / subscriber limitsDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Constant Contact

  • Email send limitsDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Constant Contact

  • AutomationConstant Contact

    Campaign Monitor

    Constant Contact

  • TemplatesCampaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor

    Constant Contact

Which email marketing is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Campaign Monitor

    Best for templates

    Campaign Monitor leads on templates (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Campaign Monitor

    Best for segmentation

    Campaign Monitor leads on segmentation (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Campaign Monitor

    Best for ai features

    Campaign Monitor leads on ai features (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Constant Contact

    Best for automation

    Constant Contact leads on automation (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

    Constant Contact

    Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

  • Automation

    Constant Contact wins

    Campaign Monitor

    Trails Constant Contact on this criterion

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact leads on automation (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Segmentation

    Campaign Monitor wins

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor leads on segmentation (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Constant Contact

    Trails Campaign Monitor on this criterion

  • Analytics

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Constant Contact

    Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Templates

    Campaign Monitor wins

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor leads on templates (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Constant Contact

    Trails Campaign Monitor on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Campaign Monitor if

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Choose Constant Contact if

  • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Campaign Monitor and Constant Contact?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.