SoftwareGlimpse

Campaign Monitor vs GetResponse

Campaign Monitor fits brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design; GetResponse fits teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/lps.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20266 evidence sources10 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

7/10

Design-led email marketing by Marigold with contact-tier Lite, Essentials, Premier, and Enterprise.

Best for

  • • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design
  • • Agencies needing multi-account tooling on higher plans

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

GetResponse is the stronger overall fit

Choose Campaign Monitor when design-led templates and agency packaging are the job; choose GetResponse when forever-free entry and stronger automation bundling matter more.

GetResponse is better for

  • ✓ Automation
  • ✓ Landing pages
  • ✓ Integrations
  • ✓ AI features

Tie

  • • Templates
  • • Segmentation
  • • Analytics

Choose Campaign Monitor if: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design

Choose GetResponse if: Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
GetResponse logo

GetResponse

7.5/10

GetResponse is an AI-driven email marketing and lifecycle automation platform with newsletters, automation workflows, landing pages, funnels, webinars (higher plans), and ecommerce tools. Paid plans use contact-list tiers with unlimited monthly email sends; a forever-free plan an

Best for

  • • Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs
  • • SMBs wanting stronger automation than design-first ESPs

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Quick verdict

Start here — then dig into the evidence below.

Choose Campaign Monitor if…

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design
  • Agencies needing multi-account tooling on higher plans

Choose GetResponse if…

  • Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs
  • SMBs wanting stronger automation than design-first ESPs
  • You prioritize automation
  • You prioritize landing pages

Overall recommendation

Choose Campaign Monitor when design-led templates and agency packaging are the job; choose GetResponse when forever-free entry and stronger automation bundling matter more.

Key trade-off

GetResponse's clearest edge is automation.

Winner by category

Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.

DimensionWinnerWhy
AutomationGetResponse winsGetResponse leads on automation (6/10 vs 8/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.
TemplatesTieCampaign Monitor and GetResponse have the same researched availability on email templates (Campaign Monitor: supported; GetResponse: supported).
SegmentationTieCampaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on segmentation (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.
Landing pagesGetResponse winsStronger landing pages availability
ReportingTieCampaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.
IntegrationsGetResponse winsStronger forms availability
AI featuresGetResponse winsGetResponse leads on ai-features (6/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

Side-by-side feature matrix

Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.

Campaigns

FeatureCampaign MonitorGetResponse
Email campaignsStrongStrong
Newsletter builderStrongStrong
Email templatesStrongStrong
Drag-and-drop editorStrongStrong
Landing pagesModerateStrong
FormsModerateStrong

Automation & targeting

FeatureCampaign MonitorGetResponse
Automation workflowsStrongStrong
SegmentationStrongStrong
PersonalizationStrongStrong
A/B testingStrongStrong
Transactional emailModerateModerate

Platform

FeatureCampaign MonitorGetResponse
AnalyticsStrongStrong
Deliverability toolsStrongStrong
AI content generationStrongStrong

Additional capabilities

FeatureCampaign MonitorGetResponse
Contact managementStrongStrong

Pricing comparison

Pricing evidence last checked Sep 8, 2026.

Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

From $13.00/user/mo

No free planFree trial available
  • Lite$13.00/mo
  • Essentials$31.00/mo
  • Premier$171.00/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom
GetResponse logo

GetResponse

From $19.00/user/mo

Free plan availableFree trial available
  • Free$0.00/user/mo
  • Starter$19.00/mo
  • Marketer$59.00/mo
  • Creator$69.00/mo
  • EnterpriseCustom

Seat-count estimates

Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.

SeatsCampaign MonitorGetResponse
5~$65.00/mo (5 × starting seat)~$95.00/mo (5 × starting seat)
10~$130.00/mo (10 × starting seat)~$190.00/mo (10 × starting seat)
25~$325.00/mo (25 × starting seat)~$475.00/mo (25 × starting seat)
50~$650.00/mo (50 × starting seat)~$950.00/mo (50 × starting seat)

Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.

Campaign Monitor: Lite ~$13 / Essentials $31 / Premier ~$171 at 0–500 contacts (research). GetResponse: Free + Starter from $19/mo at ~1k contacts. Confirm live vendor pricing.

Open cost calculator →

Best for

Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.

  • → GetResponse

    Best for automation

    GetResponse leads on automation (6/10 vs 8/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • → GetResponse

    Best for landing pages

    Stronger landing pages availability

  • → GetResponse

    Best for integrations

    Stronger forms availability

The differences that actually matter

Pair-specific analysis for Campaign Monitor vs GetResponse — not generic category copy.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Starting pricing: Campaign Monitor — Campaign Monitor: no forever free; 30-day trial; Lite from ~$13/mo at 0–500 contacts. GetResponse: forever-free + Starter from $19/mo at ~1k contacts.. GetResponse — Campaign Monitor: no forever free; 30-day trial; Lite from ~$13/mo at 0–500 contacts. GetResponse: forever-free + Starter from $19/mo at ~1k contacts.. Feature evidence also diverges on Landing pages (Campaign Monitor: Moderate; GetResponse: Strong); Forms (Campaign Monitor: Moderate; GetResponse: Strong).

  • Automation

    GetResponse ahead

    On automation, GetResponse is ahead. Campaign Monitor: Trails GetResponse on this criterion. GetResponse: GetResponse leads on automation (6/10 vs 8/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending..

  • Segmentation

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on segmentation. Campaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on segmentation (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Analytics

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on analytics. Campaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from SoftwareGlimpse research-grounded editorial judgments — not hands-on lab testing. ActiveCampaign/Mailchimp scores may map from crm-editorial evidence where EM re-scores are pending.

  • Templates

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor and GetResponse are close on templates. Campaign Monitor and GetResponse have the same researched availability on email templates (Campaign Monitor: supported; GetResponse: supported).

Pros and cons

Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.

Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

Cons

  • Trails on automation
  • Trails on landing pages
  • Trails on integrations
GetResponse logo

GetResponse

Pros

  • Stronger on automation
  • Stronger on landing pages
  • Stronger on integrations
  • Stronger on ai features

Who should not choose each product

Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.

Don't choose Campaign Monitor if…

  • You need GetResponse's stronger automation more than Campaign Monitor's strengths
  • You need GetResponse's stronger landing pages more than Campaign Monitor's strengths
  • You need GetResponse's stronger integrations more than Campaign Monitor's strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs

Don't choose GetResponse if…

  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: Agencies needing multi-account tooling on higher plans

Alternatives worth considering

When neither product is the right fit.

  • Email marketing with CRM features; freemium entry (secondary category: marketing).

  • Creator- and SMB-focused email marketing with free forever, Lite/Plus tiers, and landing pages.

  • Email marketing automation ESP with multi-step journeys; CRM pipelines strongest on Plus+; contact-based pricing.

  • Ecommerce email + SMS platform with Shopify-native flows, revenue attribution, and active-profile billing.

Final verdict

Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.

Campaign Monitor wins when…

Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design

GetResponse wins when…

Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs

  • Best for automationGetResponse
  • Best for landing pagesGetResponse
  • Best for integrationsGetResponse

Which one should you choose?

Choose Campaign Monitor if:

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design
  • Agencies needing multi-account tooling on higher plans

Choose GetResponse if:

  • Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs
  • SMBs wanting stronger automation than design-first ESPs

Product screenshots

Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.

Campaign Monitor

  • Email builder UI from official Campaign Monitor homepage.
  • Template builder UI from official Campaign Monitor features page.
  • Reporting UI from official Campaign Monitor site.
  • Automation product visual from official Campaign Monitor homepage.

GetResponse

  • Email editor UI from official GetResponse email marketing page.
  • Campaign analytics UI from official GetResponse email marketing page.

FAQ

Is Campaign Monitor better than GetResponse?
GetResponse is the stronger overall fit. Choose Campaign Monitor when design-led templates and agency packaging are the job; choose GetResponse when forever-free entry and stronger automation bundling matter more.
Which email marketing fits which team?
Campaign Monitor: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design GetResponse: Teams needing free-tier entry plus automation/LPs
Does Campaign Monitor or GetResponse have a free plan?
Campaign Monitor: No free plan. GetResponse: Free plan available.
How does Campaign Monitor vs GetResponse pricing compare?
Campaign Monitor starts from $13.00/user/mo. GetResponse starts from $19.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.

Still deciding between Campaign Monitor and GetResponse?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.

Part of Software comparisons · Email Marketing Software hub

Try a decision tool

Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.