SoftwareGlimpse

Close vs SugarCRM

Compare Close and SugarCRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20268 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Close logo

Close

7.4/10

Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.

Best for

  • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
  • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
  • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Close and SugarCRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Close is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Administration

SugarCRM is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization
  • Scalability

Tie

  • Reporting
  • Integrations

Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM

Choose SugarCRM if: SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs

See detailed comparison ↓
SugarCRM logo

SugarCRM

7.1/10

Customer experience CRM (Sugar Sell) with Standard through Premier editions and Sugar Intelligence AI.

Best for

  • SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs
  • SugarCRM competes in enterprise/mid-market CRM evaluations
  • Sales/CX CRM focus

Starting from $59.00/user/mo

No free plan

Close vs SugarCRM at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useClose

    Close

    SugarCRM

  • Pipeline managementSugarCRM

    Close

    SugarCRM

  • Sales automationClose

    Close

    SugarCRM

  • Email capabilitiesClose

    Close

    SugarCRM

  • ReportingTie

    Close

    SugarCRM

Which CRM is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Close

    Best for ease of use

    Close leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Close

    Best for sales automation

    Close leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Close

    Best for email capabilities

    Close leads on email capabilities (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • SugarCRM

    Best for pipeline management

    Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

  • SugarCRM

    Best for customization

    SugarCRM leads on customization (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • SugarCRM

    Best for scalability

    Stronger coverage across custom objects, custom pipelines, integrations. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Pipeline management

    SugarCRM wins

    Close

    Trails SugarCRM on this criterion

    SugarCRM

    Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

  • Email capabilities

    Close wins

    Close

    Close leads on email capabilities (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    SugarCRM

    Trails Close on this criterion

  • Sales automation

    Close wins

    Close

    Close leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    SugarCRM

    Trails Close on this criterion

  • Reporting

    Tie

    Close

    Close and SugarCRM are close on reporting (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    SugarCRM

    Close and SugarCRM are close on reporting (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Depends

    Close

    Close researched starting price $9/user/mo vs SugarCRM $59/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    SugarCRM

    Close researched starting price $9/user/mo vs SugarCRM $59/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

Which should you choose?

Choose Close if

  • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
  • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
  • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM

Choose SugarCRM if

  • SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs
  • SugarCRM competes in enterprise/mid-market CRM evaluations
  • Sales/CX CRM focus

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Close and SugarCRM?

Use Find My CRM for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.