SoftwareGlimpse

Close vs SugarCRM

Compare Close and SugarCRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20268 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Close logo

Close

7.4/10

Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.

Best for

  • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
  • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
  • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Close and SugarCRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Close is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Administration

SugarCRM is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization
  • Scalability

Tie

  • Reporting
  • Integrations

Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM

Choose SugarCRM if: SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs

See detailed comparison ↓
SugarCRM logo

SugarCRM

7.1/10

Customer experience CRM (Sugar Sell) with Standard through Premier editions and Sugar Intelligence AI.

Best for

  • SugarCRM targets mid-market sales/CX needs
  • SugarCRM competes in enterprise/mid-market CRM evaluations
  • Sales/CX CRM focus

Starting from $59.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Close and SugarCRM. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Close

    Close leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    SugarCRM6/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    SugarCRM

    Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

    Close8/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Close

    Close leads on sales automation (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Close

    Close leads on email capabilities (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close8/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Tie

    Close and SugarCRM are close on reporting (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close7/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    SugarCRM

    SugarCRM leads on customization (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close7/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Close and SugarCRM are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Close7/10
    SugarCRM7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Close

    Close leads on administration (7/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    CloseStronger
    SugarCRMWeaker
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    SugarCRM

    Stronger coverage across custom objects, custom pipelines, integrations. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

    Close8/10
    SugarCRM8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Depends

    Close researched starting price $9/user/mo vs SugarCRM $59/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Close6/10
    SugarCRM8/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.