SoftwareGlimpse

When I Work vs Workable

Compare When I Work and Workable on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
When I Work logo

When I Work

7.9/10

Per-user hourly scheduling — Essentials from $2.50/user/mo; Pro $5; Premium $8; 14-day trial. Time & attendance is a paid toggle.

Best for

  • Hourly teams that mainly need scheduling and messaging at a low per-user price
  • Operators who will trial 14 days before buying Deputy or Homebase hubs
  • Multi-location teams that stay on Essentials+ for templates and OpenShifts

Starting from $2.50/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

When I Work is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Integrations

Choose When I Work if: Hourly teams that mainly need scheduling and messaging at a low per-user price

Choose Workable if: SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices

See detailed comparison ↓
Workable logo

Workable

7.2/10

Recruiting + light HR ATS with published floors — Standard $299/mo (1–20 employees, annual); Premier $599; Enterprise $719.

Best for

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

Starting from $299.00/user/mo

No free plan

When I Work vs Workable at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingWhen I Work

    When I Work

    Workable

  • Free planDepends

    When I Work

    Workable

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    When I Work

    Workable

  • IntegrationsWhen I Work

    When I Work

    Workable

Which HR software is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • When I Work

    Best for starting pricing

    When I Work publishes a lower researched starting floor ($2.5/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

  • When I Work

    Best for integrations

    When I Work leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    When I Work wins

    When I Work

    When I Work publishes a lower researched starting floor ($2.5/mo vs $299/mo for Workable). Confirm currency, renewals, and add-ons — not a total TCO winner.

    Workable

    Trails When I Work on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose When I Work if

  • Hourly teams that mainly need scheduling and messaging at a low per-user price
  • Operators who will trial 14 days before buying Deputy or Homebase hubs
  • Multi-location teams that stay on Essentials+ for templates and OpenShifts

Choose Workable if

  • SMB and lower mid-market teams that want a dedicated ATS with published prices
  • Hiring teams that want a 15-day trial before a custom enterprise ATS quote
  • Companies that may use Workable’s light HR features without buying a full HRIS

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between When I Work and Workable?

Use Best HR software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.