SoftwareGlimpse

Dialpad vs Microsoft Teams

Compare Dialpad and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20268 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Dialpad logo

Dialpad

8.5/10

AI-first cloud phone (Dialpad Connect) with included transcription/summaries — Standard from $15/user/month annual; Sell and Support are separate product ladders.

Best for

  • Teams that want AI transcription and call summaries included in the cloud phone licence
  • SMB and mid-market buyers starting on Connect Standard at a clear $15 annual floor
  • Sales orgs willing to add Dialpad Sell when power dialer becomes the primary job

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Dialpad is better for

  • Number / country coverage
  • Power dialer
  • WhatsApp Business
  • Routing & IVR

Microsoft Teams is better for

  • CRM / CTI integrations

Choose Dialpad if: Teams that want AI transcription and call summaries included in the cloud phone licence

Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

See detailed comparison ↓
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

7.3/10

M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.

Best for

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Dialpad vs Microsoft Teams at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Dialpad

    Microsoft Teams

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Dialpad

    Microsoft Teams

  • Number / country coverageDialpad

    Dialpad

    Microsoft Teams

  • Power dialerDialpad

    Dialpad

    Microsoft Teams

  • WhatsApp BusinessDialpad

    Dialpad

    Microsoft Teams

Which business communications is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Dialpad

    Best for number / country coverage

    Stronger cloud phone availability

  • Dialpad

    Best for power dialer

    Dialpad leads on power dialer (8/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Dialpad

    Best for whatsapp business

    Stronger whatsapp business availability

  • Microsoft Teams

    Best for crm / cti integrations

    Microsoft Teams leads on crm integrations (8/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Dialpad

    Dialpad researched starting price from $15/mo; Microsoft Teams researched starting price from $0/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.

    Microsoft Teams

    Dialpad researched starting price from $15/mo; Microsoft Teams researched starting price from $0/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.

  • WhatsApp Business

    Dialpad wins

    Dialpad

    Stronger whatsapp business availability

    Microsoft Teams

    Trails Dialpad on this criterion

  • Power dialer

    Dialpad wins

    Dialpad

    Dialpad leads on power dialer (8/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Teams

    Trails Dialpad on this criterion

  • Routing & IVR

    Dialpad wins

    Dialpad

    Dialpad leads on routing (9/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Microsoft Teams

    Trails Dialpad on this criterion

  • CRM / CTI integrations

    Microsoft Teams wins

    Dialpad

    Trails Microsoft Teams on this criterion

    Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams leads on crm integrations (8/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Dialpad if

  • Teams that want AI transcription and call summaries included in the cloud phone licence
  • SMB and mid-market buyers starting on Connect Standard at a clear $15 annual floor
  • Sales orgs willing to add Dialpad Sell when power dialer becomes the primary job

Choose Microsoft Teams if

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Dialpad and Microsoft Teams?

Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.