SoftwareGlimpse

Constant Contact vs Mailjet

Compare Constant Contact and Mailjet on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sourcesHow we compare
Compare another
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

6.5/10

SMB and local-business email marketing with event tools and brand recognition across North America.

Best for

  • • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

Starting from $12.00/user/mo

No free plan

Visit Constant Contact
Read review

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Constant Contact and Mailjet. Choose Constant Contact when Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing. Choose Mailjet when EU/SMB teams needing marketing + transactional email in one vendor. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Constant Contact is better for

  • ✓ Analytics

Mailjet is better for

  • ✓ Landing pages
  • ✓ AI features

Tie

  • • Automation
  • • Templates
  • • Segmentation

Choose Constant Contact if: Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing

Choose Mailjet if: EU/SMB teams needing marketing + transactional email in one vendor

See detailed comparison ↓
Mailjet logo

Mailjet

6.9/10

EU-friendly email platform for marketing and transactional sending with send-volume pricing (Sinch).

Best for

  • • EU/SMB teams needing marketing + transactional email in one vendor
  • • Developers wanting API/SMTP alongside campaigns
  • • Buyers comparing send-volume pricing vs contact-tier ESPs

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Mailjet
Read review

Constant Contact vs Mailjet at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailjet

  • Contact / subscriber limitsDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailjet

  • Email send limitsDepends

    Constant Contact

    Mailjet

  • AutomationTie

    Constant Contact

    Mailjet

  • TemplatesTie

    Constant Contact

    Mailjet

Which email marketing is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • → Constant Contact

    Best for analytics

    Constant Contact leads on analytics (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • → Mailjet

    Best for landing pages

    Stronger landing pages availability

  • → Mailjet

    Best for ai features

    Mailjet leads on ai features (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo; Mailjet researched starting price from $9/mo; a free plan is researched. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

    Mailjet

    Constant Contact researched starting price from $12/mo; Mailjet researched starting price from $9/mo; a free plan is researched. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

  • Automation

    Tie

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on automation (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailjet

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on automation (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Segmentation

    Tie

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on segmentation (6/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailjet

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on segmentation (6/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Analytics

    Constant Contact wins

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact leads on analytics (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailjet

    Trails Constant Contact on this criterion

  • Templates

    Tie

    Constant Contact

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on templates (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailjet

    Constant Contact and Mailjet are close on templates (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Constant Contact if

  • Local SMBs and nonprofits needing brand-familiar email marketing
  • Teams running events alongside email campaigns
  • Buyers who value phone/support culture and NA brand recognition

Choose Mailjet if

  • EU/SMB teams needing marketing + transactional email in one vendor
  • Developers wanting API/SMTP alongside campaigns
  • Buyers comparing send-volume pricing vs contact-tier ESPs

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Constant Contact and Mailjet?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

Best email marketing softwareCompare another
  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.