SoftwareGlimpse

Apollo.io vs Closely

Compare Apollo.io and Closely on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20268 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Closely. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Closely when B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Apollo.io is better for

  • Email outreach
  • Value for money

Closely is better for

  • Prospecting

Tie

  • Ease of use
  • Integrations

Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams

Choose Closely if: B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email

See detailed comparison ↓
Closely logo

Closely

6.4/10

LinkedIn + email outbound automation platform with enrichment, AI agents, and white-label options for agencies.

Best for

  • B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
  • Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
  • Teams that want transparent mid-market automation pricing

Starting from $29.00/user/mo

No free plan

Apollo.io vs Closely at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useTie

    Apollo.io

    Closely

  • Contact dataDepends

    Apollo.io

    Closely

  • ProspectingClosely

    Apollo.io

    Closely

  • Email outreachApollo.io

    Apollo.io

    Closely

  • IntegrationsTie

    Apollo.io

    Closely

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for email outreach

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for value for money

    Better for value for money

  • Closely

    Best for prospecting

    Stronger coverage across prospecting, lead scoring, data enrichment.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Depends

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io vs Closely on contact data is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.

    Closely

    Apollo.io vs Closely on contact data is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.

  • Prospecting

    Closely wins

    Apollo.io

    Trails Closely on this criterion

    Closely

    Stronger coverage across prospecting, lead scoring, data enrichment.

  • Email outreach

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Closely

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

  • Integrations

    Tie

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io and Closely are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Closely

    Apollo.io and Closely are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Better for value for money

    Closely

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Choose Closely if

  • B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
  • Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
  • Teams that want transparent mid-market automation pricing

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Apollo.io and Closely?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.