Apollo.io vs Closely
Apollo.io fits outbound and growth sales teams; Closely fits b2b outbound teams automating linkedin + email.

Apollo.io
Best for
- • Outbound and growth sales teams
- • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
- • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Closely. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Closely when B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Apollo.io is better for
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Value for money
Closely is better for
- ✓ Prospecting
Tie
- • Ease of use
- • Integrations
Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams
Choose Closely if: B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email

Closely
LinkedIn + email outbound automation platform with enrichment, AI agents, and white-label options for agencies.
Best for
- • B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- • Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
- • Teams that want transparent mid-market automation pricing
Starting from $29.00/user/mo
No free plan
Quick verdict
Start here — then dig into the evidence below.
Choose Apollo.io if…
- Outbound and growth sales teams
- RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
- Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards
- You prioritize email outreach
Choose Closely if…
- B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
- Teams that want transparent mid-market automation pricing
- You prioritize prospecting
Overall recommendation
There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Closely. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Closely when B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Key trade-off
Apollo.io trades toward email outreach; Closely trades toward prospecting.
Winner by category
Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.
| Dimension | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Tie | Apollo.io and Closely are close on ease of use (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing. |
| Prospecting | Closely wins | Stronger coverage across prospecting, lead scoring, data enrichment. |
| Email outreach | Apollo.io wins | Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing. |
| Integrations | Tie | Apollo.io and Closely are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing. |
| Value | Apollo.io wins | Better for value for money |
Side-by-side feature matrix
Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.
Core CRM
| Feature | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| Contact management | Strong | Not evidenced |
| Lead management | Strong | Strong |
| Pipeline management | Moderate | Moderate |
| Deal management | Moderate | Limited |
Sales engagement
| Feature | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| Email sync | Not evidenced | Strong |
| Email tracking | Strong | Not evidenced |
| Email sequences | Strong | Strong |
| Call functionality | Strong | Moderate |
| Workflow automation | Strong | Strong |
| Sales automation | Strong | Strong |
| Lead scoring | Not evidenced | Strong |
Reporting
| Feature | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| Reporting | Strong | Strong |
| Forecasting | Not evidenced | Limited |
Platform
| Feature | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Strong | Strong |
| Custom fields | Not evidenced | Moderate |
| Custom pipelines | Not evidenced | Limited |
| Mobile app | Strong | Not evidenced |
| AI assistance | Strong | Strong |
Additional capabilities
| Feature | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| Prospecting | Strong | Strong |
| Data enrichment | Strong | Strong |
| Contact data | Strong | Strong |
| CRM sync | Strong | Strong |
| List building | Strong | Strong |
| Data export | Strong | Strong |
| Email outreach | Strong | Strong |
Pricing comparison
Pricing evidence last checked Sep 7, 2026.
Apollo.io
From $49.00/user/mo
- Free$0.00/user/mo
- Basic$49.00/user/mo
- Professional$99.00/user/mo
- EnterpriseCustom
Closely
From $29.00/user/mo
- Starter$29.00/mo
- Growth$87.00/mo
- Essential$145.00/mo
- CustomCustom
Seat-count estimates
Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.
| Seats | Apollo.io | Closely |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | ~$245.00/mo (5 × starting seat) | ~$145.00/mo (5 × starting seat) |
| 10 | ~$490.00/mo (10 × starting seat) | ~$290.00/mo (10 × starting seat) |
| 25 | ~$1,225.00/mo (25 × starting seat) | ~$725.00/mo (25 × starting seat) |
| 50 | ~$2,450.00/mo (50 × starting seat) | ~$1,450.00/mo (50 × starting seat) |
Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.
Apollo.io researched starting price from $49/mo; a free plan is researched. Closely researched starting price from $29/mo. Affiliate economics excluded.
Best for
Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.
- → Apollo.io
Best for email outreach
Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Apollo.io
Best for value for money
Better for value for money
- → Closely
Best for prospecting
Stronger coverage across prospecting, lead scoring, data enrichment.
The differences that actually matter
Pair-specific analysis for Apollo.io vs Closely — not generic category copy.
Contact data
DependsContact data: Apollo.io — Apollo.io vs Closely on contact data is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.. Closely — Apollo.io vs Closely on contact data is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.. Feature evidence also diverges on Deal management (Apollo.io: Moderate; Closely: Limited); Call functionality (Apollo.io: Strong; Closely: Moderate).
Prospecting
Closely aheadOn prospecting, Closely is ahead. Apollo.io: Trails Closely on this criterion. Closely: Stronger coverage across prospecting, lead scoring, data enrichment..
Email outreach
Apollo.io aheadOn email outreach, Apollo.io is ahead. Apollo.io: Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.. Closely: Trails Apollo.io on this criterion.
Integrations
TieApollo.io and Closely are close on integrations. Apollo.io and Closely are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Value for money
Apollo.io aheadOn value for money, Apollo.io is ahead. Apollo.io: Better for value for money. Closely: Trails Apollo.io on this criterion.
Pros and cons
Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.
Apollo.io
Pros
- Stronger on email outreach
- Stronger on value for money
Cons
- Trails on prospecting
Closely
Pros
- Stronger on prospecting
Cons
- Trails on email outreach
- Trails on value for money
Implementation & learning curve
Based on researched setup / ease criteria for this pair.
Apollo.io
- Comparable ease of use to Closely
Closely
- Comparable ease of use to Apollo.io
Integrations
Overlaps and exclusives from product integration data when available.
Apollo.io: Strong. Closely: Strong.
Who should not choose each product
Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.
Don't choose Apollo.io if…
- You need Closely's stronger prospecting more than Apollo.io's strengths
- Your primary fit looks closer to: B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
Don't choose Closely if…
- You need Apollo.io's stronger email outreach more than Closely's strengths
- You need Apollo.io's stronger value for money more than Closely's strengths
- Your primary fit looks closer to: Outbound and growth sales teams
- Your primary fit looks closer to: RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
Alternatives worth considering
When neither product is the right fit.
B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.
B2B contact database for finding professional emails, phone numbers, and company insights with prospecting automations.
AI-powered multichannel outbound platform combining lead intelligence, sequences, deliverability, and Duo AI assistants.
Enterprise go-to-market intelligence platform for B2B contact/company data, enrichment, intent, and Copilot workflows — custom-quote packaging.
Final verdict
Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.
Apollo.io wins when…
Outbound and growth sales teams
Closely wins when…
B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- Best for email outreachApollo.io
- Best for value for moneyApollo.io
- Best for prospectingClosely
Which one should you choose?
Choose Apollo.io if:
- Outbound and growth sales teams
- RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
- Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards
Choose Closely if:
- B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- Agencies needing white-label outreach infrastructure
- Teams that want transparent mid-market automation pricing
Product screenshots
Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.
Apollo.io
Closely
FAQ
- Is Apollo.io better than Closely?
- There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Closely. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Closely when B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
- Which sales intelligence fits which team?
- Apollo.io: Outbound and growth sales teams Closely: B2B outbound teams automating LinkedIn + email
- Does Apollo.io or Closely have a free plan?
- Apollo.io: Free plan available. Closely: No free plan.
- How does Apollo.io vs Closely pricing compare?
- Apollo.io starts from $49.00/user/mo. Closely starts from $29.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
- How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
- We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.
- reviewApollo.io review
- reviewClosely review
- pricingApollo.io pricing
- pricingClosely pricing
- alternativeLusha alternative
- alternativeRocketReach alternative
- alternativeAmplemarket alternative
- guideWhat Is Sales Intelligence? A Clear Beginner’s Guide
- guideHow Sales Intelligence Works: Source → Verify → Sync
- guideTypes of Sales Intelligence: Data, Enrichment, Engagement & Dialers
- categorysales intelligence hub
- finderBest sales intelligence software
- calculatorCost calculator
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider

Lusha
B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.

RocketReach
B2B contact database for finding professional emails, phone numbers, and company insights with prospecting automations.

Amplemarket
AI-powered multichannel outbound platform combining lead intelligence, sequences, deliverability, and Duo AI assistants.

ZoomInfo
Enterprise go-to-market intelligence platform for B2B contact/company data, enrichment, intent, and Copilot workflows — custom-quote packaging.
Still deciding between Apollo.io and Closely?
Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.
Part of Software comparisons · Sales Intelligence Software hub
Try a decision tool
Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.







