SoftwareGlimpse

Apollo.io vs Reply.io

Compare Apollo.io and Reply.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20267 evidence sources17 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • Teams that want a free tier before buying
  • Buyers prioritizing prospecting database breadth

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Reply.io is the stronger overall fit

Apollo is stronger when free-tier evaluation and prospecting database depth matter; Reply is stronger when multichannel sequences (email/LinkedIn/calls/SMS/WhatsApp) and AI outreach are the core job.

Apollo.io is better for

  • Contact data

Reply.io is better for

  • Email outreach
  • Integrations

Tie

  • Ease of use
  • Prospecting
  • Value for money

Choose Apollo.io if: Teams that want a free tier before buying

Choose Reply.io if: SDR teams running true multichannel cadences

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
Reply.io logo

Reply.io

7.6/10

AI sales engagement platform for multichannel outbound across email, LinkedIn, calls, SMS, and WhatsApp with built-in B2B data.

Best for

  • SDR teams running true multichannel cadences
  • Agencies needing multichannel + AI SDR packaging

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

No free plan

Apollo.io vs Reply.io at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useTie

    Apollo.io

    Reply.io

  • Contact dataApollo.io

    Apollo.io

    Reply.io

  • ProspectingTie

    Apollo.io

    Reply.io

  • Email outreachReply.io

    Apollo.io

    Reply.io

  • IntegrationsReply.io

    Apollo.io

    Reply.io

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for contact data

    Apollo.io leads on contact-data (8/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Reply.io

    Best for email outreach

    Reply.io leads on email-outreach (8/10 vs 9/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Reply.io

    Best for integrations

    Reply.io leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on contact-data (8/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Reply.io

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

  • Prospecting

    Tie

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io and Reply.io are close on prospecting (8/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Reply.io

    Apollo.io and Reply.io are close on prospecting (8/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Email outreach

    Reply.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Trails Reply.io on this criterion

    Reply.io

    Reply.io leads on email-outreach (8/10 vs 9/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Reply.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Trails Reply.io on this criterion

    Reply.io

    Reply.io leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Tie

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io and Reply.io are close on value-for-money (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Reply.io

    Apollo.io and Reply.io are close on value-for-money (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Teams that want a free tier before buying
  • Buyers prioritizing prospecting database breadth

Choose Reply.io if

  • SDR teams running true multichannel cadences
  • Agencies needing multichannel + AI SDR packaging

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Apollo.io and Reply.io?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.