SoftwareGlimpse

Apollo.io vs Clearbit

Compare Apollo.io and Clearbit on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20268 evidence sources16 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Clearbit. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Clearbit when HubSpot customers that need CRM and inbound enrichment via Breeze Intelligence / Clearbit. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Apollo.io is better for

  • Contact data
  • Prospecting
  • Email outreach
  • Value for money

Clearbit is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Integrations

Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams

Choose Clearbit if: HubSpot customers that need CRM and inbound enrichment via Breeze Intelligence / Clearbit

See detailed comparison ↓
Clearbit logo

Clearbit

6.3/10

HubSpot-owned enrichment (Clearbit → Breeze Intelligence) for CRM fill and inbound intelligence — usage/credits via HubSpot, Starter+ required.

Best for

  • HubSpot customers that need CRM and inbound enrichment via Breeze Intelligence / Clearbit
  • Marketing and RevOps teams prioritizing form and CRM fill quality
  • Buyers who want enrichment without standing up a separate prospecting database

No free plan

Apollo.io vs Clearbit at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useClearbit

    Apollo.io

    Clearbit

  • Contact dataApollo.io

    Apollo.io

    Clearbit

  • ProspectingApollo.io

    Apollo.io

    Clearbit

  • Email outreachApollo.io

    Apollo.io

    Clearbit

  • IntegrationsClearbit

    Apollo.io

    Clearbit

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for contact data

    Stronger lead management availability

  • Apollo.io

    Best for prospecting

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (8/10 vs 4/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for email outreach

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 2/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Clearbit

    Best for ease of use

    Clearbit leads on ease of use (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Clearbit

    Best for integrations

    Clearbit leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Stronger lead management availability

    Clearbit

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

  • Prospecting

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (8/10 vs 4/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Clearbit

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

  • Email outreach

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 2/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Clearbit

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

  • Integrations

    Clearbit wins

    Apollo.io

    Trails Clearbit on this criterion

    Clearbit

    Clearbit leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Apollo.io wins

    Apollo.io

    Better for value for money

    Clearbit

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Choose Clearbit if

  • HubSpot customers that need CRM and inbound enrichment via Breeze Intelligence / Clearbit
  • Marketing and RevOps teams prioritizing form and CRM fill quality
  • Buyers who want enrichment without standing up a separate prospecting database

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Apollo.io and Clearbit?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.