SoftwareGlimpse

Microsoft Teams vs Slack

Compare Microsoft Teams and Slack on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20268 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Stronger overall fit
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

7.3/10

M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.

Best for

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365
  • Buyers who need chat + meetings + files under one identity plane

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Microsoft Teams is the stronger overall fit

Depends — no universal winner. This is a collaboration comparison, not a phone shootout. Slack wins for channel-first tech/product team messaging culture; Microsoft Teams wins as the M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files, identity). Buy phone separately (or Teams Phone) if PSTN is required.

Microsoft Teams is better for

  • Number / country coverage
  • Routing & IVR

Tie

  • Power dialer
  • WhatsApp Business
  • CRM / CTI integrations

Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365

Choose Slack if: Tech and product orgs standardising on channel-based team messaging

See detailed comparison ↓
Slack logo

Slack

6.7/10

Channel-based team messaging platform — Free $0, Pro $7.25/user/month annual, Business+ $15, Enterprise+ contact sales; huddles for light video, not a phone system.

Best for

  • Tech and product orgs standardising on channel-based team messaging
  • Teams that want Slack Connect and a deep app directory

Starting from $7.25/user/mo

Free plan available

Microsoft Teams vs Slack at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Microsoft Teams

    Slack

  • User / licence minimumDepends

    Microsoft Teams

    Slack

  • Number / country coverageMicrosoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams

    Slack

  • Power dialerTie

    Microsoft Teams

    Slack

  • WhatsApp BusinessTie

    Microsoft Teams

    Slack

Which business communications is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Microsoft Teams

    Best for number / country coverage

    Stronger cloud phone availability

  • Microsoft Teams

    Best for routing & ivr

    Microsoft Teams leads on routing (5/10 vs 4/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Microsoft Teams

    Both offer free tiers. Slack Pro $7.25 and Business+ $15 per user/month annual; Teams is often licensed via Microsoft 365 with a free Teams tier, while Teams Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN calling plans (~$17–$34 research floors) when telephony is required.

    Slack

    Both offer free tiers. Slack Pro $7.25 and Business+ $15 per user/month annual; Teams is often licensed via Microsoft 365 with a free Teams tier, while Teams Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN calling plans (~$17–$34 research floors) when telephony is required.

  • WhatsApp Business

    Tie

    Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams and Slack have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Microsoft Teams: not-supported; Slack: not-supported).

    Slack

    Microsoft Teams and Slack have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Microsoft Teams: not-supported; Slack: not-supported).

  • Power dialer

    Tie

    Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams and Slack have the same researched availability on power dialer (Microsoft Teams: not-supported; Slack: not-supported).

    Slack

    Microsoft Teams and Slack have the same researched availability on power dialer (Microsoft Teams: not-supported; Slack: not-supported).

  • Routing & IVR

    Microsoft Teams wins

    Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams leads on routing (5/10 vs 4/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

    Slack

    Trails Microsoft Teams on this criterion

  • CRM / CTI integrations

    Tie

    Microsoft Teams

    Microsoft Teams and Slack are close on crm-integrations (10/10 vs 10/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

    Slack

    Microsoft Teams and Slack are close on crm-integrations (10/10 vs 10/10) from SoftwareGlimpse business-communications editorial judgments grounded in vendor documentation — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Microsoft Teams if

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365
  • Buyers who need chat + meetings + files under one identity plane

Choose Slack if

  • Tech and product orgs standardising on channel-based team messaging
  • Teams that want Slack Connect and a deep app directory

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Microsoft Teams and Slack?

Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.