Microsoft Project vs Wrike
Compare Microsoft Project and Wrike on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Microsoft Project
Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.
Best for
- • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
- • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
- • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans
Starting from $10.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Microsoft Project and Wrike. Choose Microsoft Project when Microsoft 365 standardised orgs. Choose Wrike when Agencies with proofing/intake. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project is better for
- ✓ Integrations
Wrike is better for
- ✓ Free plan
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ Collaboration
Tie
- • Timeline / Gantt
Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
Choose Wrike if: Agencies with proofing/intake
Wrike
Enterprise/agency work management with proofing, intake and resourcing — Team from $10/user/mo annual.
Best for
- • Agencies with proofing/intake
- • Mid-market/enterprise cross-functional delivery
- • Teams needing resource visibility
Starting from $10.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Microsoft Project and Wrike. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Depends
Starting pricing
Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.
Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo; Wrike researched starting price from $10/mo; a free plan is researched. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.
Microsoft ProjectDependsWrikeDepends - Depends
Seat / licence minimum
Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.
Check paid seat floors for Microsoft Project and Wrike on current vendor packaging.
Microsoft ProjectDependsWrikeDepends - Wrike
Free plan
Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.
Microsoft Project does not research a free plan; Wrike researches a free plan.
Microsoft ProjectWeakerWrikeStronger - Wrike
Ease of use
How quickly teams become productive.
Wrike leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10Wrike7/10 - Tie
Timeline / Gantt
Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.
Microsoft Project and Wrike are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project9/10Wrike9/10 - Wrike
Automations
Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.
Wrike leads on automations (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10Wrike8/10 - Wrike
Collaboration
Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.
Wrike leads on collaboration (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project7/10Wrike8/10 - Microsoft Project
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Microsoft Project leads on integrations (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project9/10Wrike8/10 - Wrike
AI features
Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.
Wrike leads on ai features (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10Wrike7/10 - Wrike
Reporting
Reporting and forecasting quality.
Wrike leads on reporting (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project8/10Wrike9/10 - Wrike
Value for money
Capability relative to total cost of ownership.
Wrike leads on value for money (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10Wrike7/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.