SoftwareGlimpse

Microsoft Project vs MRPeasy

Compare Microsoft Project and MRPeasy on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources3 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

7.4/10

Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.

Best for

  • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
  • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
  • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Microsoft Project is better for

  • Integrations

MRPeasy is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Automations
  • AI features
  • Value for money

Tie

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Collaboration
  • Reporting

Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs

Choose MRPeasy if: Small manufacturers needing MRP without SAP complexity

See detailed comparison ↓
MRPeasy logo

MRPeasy

7.4/10

Manufacturing ERP and MRP software for small manufacturers — affiliate partner.

Best for

  • Small manufacturers needing MRP without SAP complexity

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

No free plan

Microsoft Project vs MRPeasy at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Microsoft Project

    MRPeasy

  • Seat / licence minimumDepends

    Microsoft Project

    MRPeasy

  • Free planDepends

    Microsoft Project

    MRPeasy

  • Ease of useMRPeasy

    Microsoft Project

    MRPeasy

  • Timeline / GanttTie

    Microsoft Project

    MRPeasy

Which project management is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Microsoft Project

    Best for integrations

    Microsoft Project leads on integrations (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • MRPeasy

    Best for ease of use

    MRPeasy leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • MRPeasy

    Best for automations

    MRPeasy leads on automations (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • MRPeasy

    Best for ai features

    MRPeasy leads on ai features (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo; MRPeasy researched starting price from $49/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    MRPeasy

    Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo; MRPeasy researched starting price from $49/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

  • Seat / licence minimum

    Depends

    Microsoft Project

    Check paid seat floors for Microsoft Project and MRPeasy on current vendor packaging.

    MRPeasy

    Check paid seat floors for Microsoft Project and MRPeasy on current vendor packaging.

  • Timeline / Gantt

    Tie

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    MRPeasy

    Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Automations

    MRPeasy wins

    Microsoft Project

    Trails MRPeasy on this criterion

    MRPeasy

    MRPeasy leads on automations (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Microsoft Project wins

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on integrations (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    MRPeasy

    Trails Microsoft Project on this criterion

  • Reporting

    Tie

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on reporting (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    MRPeasy

    Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on reporting (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Microsoft Project if

  • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
  • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
  • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans

Choose MRPeasy if

  • Small manufacturers needing MRP without SAP complexity

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Microsoft Project and MRPeasy?

Use Best project management software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.