Microsoft Project vs MRPeasy
Compare Microsoft Project and MRPeasy on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Microsoft Project
Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.
Best for
- • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
- • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
- • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans
Starting from $10.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Microsoft Project is better for
- ✓ Integrations
MRPeasy is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ AI features
- ✓ Value for money
Tie
- • Timeline / Gantt
- • Collaboration
- • Reporting
Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
Choose MRPeasy if: Small manufacturers needing MRP without SAP complexity
MRPeasy
Manufacturing ERP and MRP software for small manufacturers — affiliate partner.
Best for
- • Small manufacturers needing MRP without SAP complexity
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
No free plan
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Microsoft Project and MRPeasy. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Depends
Starting pricing
Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.
Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo; MRPeasy researched starting price from $49/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.
Microsoft ProjectDependsMRPeasyDepends - Depends
Seat / licence minimum
Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.
Check paid seat floors for Microsoft Project and MRPeasy on current vendor packaging.
Microsoft ProjectDependsMRPeasyDepends - Depends
Free plan
Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.
Microsoft Project does not research a free plan; MRPeasy does not research a free plan.
Microsoft ProjectDependsMRPeasyDepends - MRPeasy
Ease of use
How quickly teams become productive.
MRPeasy leads on ease of use (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10MRPeasy7/10 - Tie
Timeline / Gantt
Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.
Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project9/10MRPeasy9/10 - MRPeasy
Automations
Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.
MRPeasy leads on automations (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10MRPeasy7/10 - Tie
Collaboration
Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.
Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on collaboration (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project7/10MRPeasy7/10 - Microsoft Project
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Microsoft Project leads on integrations (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project9/10MRPeasy7/10 - MRPeasy
AI features
Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.
MRPeasy leads on ai features (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10MRPeasy7/10 - Tie
Reporting
Reporting and forecasting quality.
Microsoft Project and MRPeasy are close on reporting (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project8/10MRPeasy8/10 - MRPeasy
Value for money
Capability relative to total cost of ownership.
MRPeasy leads on value for money (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Project6/10MRPeasy7/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.