Kaspr vs Lusha
Compare Kaspr and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Kaspr
LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA B2B contact capture (Chrome) — Free plan; Starter from $49/mo annual headline.
Best for
- • EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
- • SMB teams capturing phones/emails from LinkedIn into CRM
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Kaspr is LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA capture; Lusha is broader enrichment-first contact data with Engage. Choose by LinkedIn Chrome workflow vs enrichment/signals depth.
Lusha is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Ease of use
- • Prospecting
- • Value for money
Choose Kaspr if: EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
Choose Lusha if: Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
Lusha
B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.
Best for
- • Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
- • Teams needing broader enrichment beyond LinkedIn-only capture
Free plan available
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Kaspr and Lusha. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Tie
Ease of use
How quickly teams become productive.
Kaspr and Lusha are close on ease-of-use (8/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Kaspr8/10Lusha7/10 - Lusha
Contact data
Coverage and quality of contact data.
Lusha leads on contact-data (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
KasprWeakerLushaStronger - Tie
Prospecting
Prospecting workflow strength.
Kaspr and Lusha are close on prospecting (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
KasprTieLushaTie - Lusha
Email outreach
Outreach sequencing and deliverability tooling.
Lusha leads on email-outreach (3/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
KasprWeakerLushaStronger - Lusha
Integrations
Important third-party integrations.
Lusha leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
KasprWeakerLushaStronger - Tie
Value for money
Capability relative to total cost of ownership.
Kaspr and Lusha are close on value-for-money (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Kaspr7/10Lusha5/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.