SoftwareGlimpse

Kaspr vs Lusha

Compare Kaspr and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 202610 evidence sources15 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Kaspr logo

Kaspr

6.3/10

LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA B2B contact capture (Chrome) — Free plan; Starter from $49/mo annual headline.

Best for

  • EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
  • SMB teams capturing phones/emails from LinkedIn into CRM

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Kaspr is LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA capture; Lusha is broader enrichment-first contact data with Engage. Choose by LinkedIn Chrome workflow vs enrichment/signals depth.

Lusha is better for

  • Contact data
  • Email outreach
  • Integrations

Tie

  • Ease of use
  • Prospecting
  • Value for money

Choose Kaspr if: EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows

Choose Lusha if: Enriching existing records with signals and Engage

See detailed comparison ↓
Lusha logo

Lusha

5.6/10

B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.

Best for

  • Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
  • Teams needing broader enrichment beyond LinkedIn-only capture

Free plan available

Kaspr vs Lusha at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useTie

    Kaspr

    Lusha

  • Contact dataLusha

    Kaspr

    Lusha

  • ProspectingTie

    Kaspr

    Lusha

  • Email outreachLusha

    Kaspr

    Lusha

  • IntegrationsLusha

    Kaspr

    Lusha

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Lusha

    Best for contact data

    Lusha leads on contact-data (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Lusha

    Best for email outreach

    Lusha leads on email-outreach (3/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Lusha

    Best for integrations

    Lusha leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Lusha wins

    Kaspr

    Trails Lusha on this criterion

    Lusha

    Lusha leads on contact-data (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Prospecting

    Tie

    Kaspr

    Kaspr and Lusha are close on prospecting (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Kaspr and Lusha are close on prospecting (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Email outreach

    Lusha wins

    Kaspr

    Trails Lusha on this criterion

    Lusha

    Lusha leads on email-outreach (3/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Lusha wins

    Kaspr

    Trails Lusha on this criterion

    Lusha

    Lusha leads on integrations (7/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Tie

    Kaspr

    Kaspr and Lusha are close on value-for-money (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Kaspr and Lusha are close on value-for-money (7/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Kaspr if

  • EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
  • SMB teams capturing phones/emails from LinkedIn into CRM

Choose Lusha if

  • Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
  • Teams needing broader enrichment beyond LinkedIn-only capture

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Kaspr and Lusha?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.