Kaspr vs Lusha
Compare Kaspr and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Kaspr
LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA B2B contact capture (Chrome) — Free plan; Starter from $49/mo annual headline.
Best for
- • EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
- • SMB teams capturing phones/emails from LinkedIn into CRM
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Kaspr is LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA capture; Lusha is broader enrichment-first contact data with Engage. Choose by LinkedIn Chrome workflow vs enrichment/signals depth.
Lusha is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Ease of use
- • Prospecting
- • Value for money
Choose Kaspr if: EU LinkedIn/Sales Navigator reveal workflows
Choose Lusha if: Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
Lusha
B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.
Best for
- • Enriching existing records with signals and Engage
- • Teams needing broader enrichment beyond LinkedIn-only capture
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
10
Criteria
6
Screenshots
15
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Kaspr — Official Site | Kaspr | official-product-page |
| Kaspr Pricing | Kaspr | official-pricing-page |
| Kaspr Product | Kaspr | official-product-page |
| Kaspr Pricing | Kaspr | official-product-page |
| Lusha Billing FAQ | Lusha | official-help-center |
| Lusha’s Pricing System | Lusha | official-help-center |
| Introduction to Lusha | Lusha | official-help-center |
| Lusha’s Key Features at a Glance | Lusha | official-help-center |
| Available CRM Integrations | Lusha | official-help-center |
| Lusha Pricing | Lusha | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.