SoftwareGlimpse

Copper vs Keap

Compare Copper and Keap on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20265 evidence sources22 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Copper logo

Copper

7.2/10

Google Workspace-native CRM for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Best for

  • Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Copper is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Copper is a Google Workspace-native CRM built for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Starting from $23.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Copper and Keap. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Copper is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Pipeline management
  • Integrations
  • Administration

Keap is better for

  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting
  • Customization

Choose Copper if: Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations

Choose Keap if: Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators

See detailed comparison ↓
Keap logo

Keap

7/10

Best for

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

Starting from $249.00/user/mo

No free plan

Copper vs Keap at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useCopper

    Copper

    Keap

  • Pipeline managementCopper

    Copper

    Keap

  • Sales automationKeap

    Copper

    Keap

  • Email capabilitiesKeap

    Copper

    Keap

  • ReportingKeap

    Copper

    Keap

Which CRM is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Copper

    Best for ease of use

    Copper leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Copper

    Best for pipeline management

    Copper leads on pipeline management (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Copper

    Best for integrations

    Copper leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Keap

    Best for sales automation

    Keap leads on sales automation (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Keap

    Best for email capabilities

    Stronger coverage across email sync, email tracking, email sequences, call functionality. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

  • Keap

    Best for reporting

    Keap leads on reporting (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Pipeline management

    Copper wins

    Copper

    Copper leads on pipeline management (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Keap

    Trails Copper on this criterion

  • Email capabilities

    Keap wins

    Copper

    Trails Keap on this criterion

    Keap

    Stronger coverage across email sync, email tracking, email sequences, call functionality. editorial scores are close (8/10 vs 8/10).

  • Sales automation

    Keap wins

    Copper

    Trails Keap on this criterion

    Keap

    Keap leads on sales automation (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Reporting

    Keap wins

    Copper

    Trails Keap on this criterion

    Keap

    Keap leads on reporting (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Value for money

    Depends

    Copper

    Copper researched starting price $23/user/mo vs Keap $249/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Keap

    Copper researched starting price $23/user/mo vs Keap $249/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

Which should you choose?

Choose Copper if

  • Copper fits many small-business CRM evaluations
  • Copper is evaluated here as a CRM/sales tool
  • Copper is a Google Workspace-native CRM built for pipeline and relationship management inside Gmail and Google apps.

Choose Keap if

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Copper and Keap?

Use Find My CRM for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.