SoftwareGlimpse

Apptivo vs Keap

Compare Apptivo and Keap on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 20, 20267 evidence sources12 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apptivo logo

Apptivo

6.5/10

All-in-one suite CRM; Lite from $15/user/mo annual through Ultimate $40, Enterprise custom.

Best for

  • All-in-one business suite CRM with Lite, Premium, and Ultimate per-user plans plus Enterprise custom
  • Affordable all-in-one CRM and business apps suite for SMBs that want more than sales pipeline alone.

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Apptivo and Keap. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.

Apptivo is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Customization
  • Administration
  • Scalability

Keap is better for

  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting
  • Integrations

Tie

  • Ease of use

Choose Apptivo if: All-in-one business suite CRM with Lite, Premium, and Ultimate per-user plans plus Enterprise custom

Choose Keap if: Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators

See detailed comparison ↓
Keap logo

Keap

7/10

Best for

  • Core packaging and automation library target SMB operators
  • Email/SMS campaigns and automations are first-class
  • Built for small businesses that want CRM plus marketing automation, payments, and proven campaign automations in one platform.

Starting from $249.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Apptivo and Keap. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Tie

    Apptivo and Keap are close on ease of use (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apptivo7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Pipeline management

    Deal stages, visibility, and pipeline hygiene.

    Apptivo

    Stronger coverage across pipeline management, deal management, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (7/10 vs 7/10).

    Apptivo7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Sales automation

    Automations that reduce repetitive sales work.

    Keap

    Keap leads on sales automation (6/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apptivo6/10
    Keap9/10
  • Email capabilities

    Native email workflows and tracking.

    Keap

    Keap leads on email capabilities (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apptivo6/10
    Keap8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Keap

    Keap leads on reporting (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apptivo6/10
    Keap7/10
  • Customization

    Fields, workflows, and configurability.

    Apptivo

    Stronger coverage across custom fields, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (7/10 vs 7/10).

    Apptivo7/10
    Keap7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Keap

    Keap leads on integrations (6/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apptivo6/10
    Keap7/10
  • Administration

    Admin overhead and ongoing maintenance.

    Apptivo

    Stronger coverage across sso, custom fields, custom objects, custom pipelines. editorial scores are close (6/10 vs 6/10).

    ApptivoStronger
    KeapWeaker
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    Apptivo

    Stronger coverage across custom objects, custom pipelines, integrations. editorial scores are close (6/10 vs 6/10).

    Apptivo6/10
    Keap6/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Depends

    Apptivo researched starting price $15/user/mo vs Keap $249/user/mo. Better value depends on which features you need on that plan.

    Apptivo8/10
    Keap6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.