Aircall vs Microsoft Teams
Compare Aircall and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Aircall
Mid-market cloud phone and customer-conversation platform with deep CRM/helpdesk CTI, IVR, power dialer on Professional, and paid AI add-ons — 3-licence minimum.
Best for
- • Mid-market sales and support teams that need CRM/helpdesk CTI as a primary buying criterion
- • Teams running inbound queues and IVR alongside outbound calling in one phone system
- • Salesforce, HubSpot or Zendesk shops that want click-to-dial and bidirectional call logging out of the box
Starting from $30.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Aircall is better for
- ✓ Number / country coverage
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ WhatsApp Business
- ✓ Routing & IVR
Tie
- • CRM / CTI integrations
- • AI features
Choose Aircall if: Mid-market sales and support teams that need CRM/helpdesk CTI as a primary buying criterion
Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Microsoft Teams
M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.
Best for
- • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Starting from $0.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Aircall vs Microsoft Teams at a glance
Criterion-level leaders from verified research.
Scorecard preview
Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.
- Starting pricingDepends
Aircall
Microsoft Teams
- User / licence minimumDepends
Aircall
Microsoft Teams
- Number / country coverageAircall
Aircall
Microsoft Teams
- Power dialerAircall
Aircall
Microsoft Teams
- WhatsApp BusinessAircall
Aircall
Microsoft Teams
Which business communications is better for you?
Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.
- → Aircall
Best for number / country coverage
Stronger cloud phone availability
- → Aircall
Best for power dialer
Aircall leads on power dialer (8/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
- → Aircall
Best for whatsapp business
Stronger whatsapp business availability
The biggest differences
Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.
Starting pricing
DependsAircall
Aircall researched starting price from $30/mo; Microsoft Teams researched starting price from $0/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.
Microsoft Teams
Aircall researched starting price from $30/mo; Microsoft Teams researched starting price from $0/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.
WhatsApp Business
Aircall winsAircall
Stronger whatsapp business availability
Microsoft Teams
Trails Aircall on this criterion
Power dialer
Aircall winsAircall
Aircall leads on power dialer (8/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Teams
Trails Aircall on this criterion
Routing & IVR
Aircall winsAircall
Aircall leads on routing (9/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Teams
Trails Aircall on this criterion
CRM / CTI integrations
TieAircall
Aircall and Microsoft Teams are close on crm integrations (10/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Microsoft Teams
Aircall and Microsoft Teams are close on crm integrations (10/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Which should you choose?
Choose Aircall if
- Mid-market sales and support teams that need CRM/helpdesk CTI as a primary buying criterion
- Teams running inbound queues and IVR alongside outbound calling in one phone system
- Salesforce, HubSpot or Zendesk shops that want click-to-dial and bidirectional call logging out of the box
Choose Microsoft Teams if
- Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Related comparisons
Alternatives to consider

RingCentral
Enterprise-grade UCaaS / cloud phone platform (RingEX) with deep call routing, video, team messaging and contact-centre options — Core from ~$20/user/month annual.

Dialpad
AI-first cloud phone (Dialpad Connect) with included transcription/summaries — Standard from $15/user/month annual; Sell and Support are separate product ladders.

Zoom
Meetings-first Workplace suite plus Zoom Phone UCaaS — Phone US/CA Unlimited research floor ~$15–16/user/month; free meetings/chat exist but Phone is paid.

Nextiva
SMB-friendly unified business communications — Core $15, Engage $25, Scale $75 per user/month annual, with messaging apps including WhatsApp and a Contact Center ladder from $75/agent.
How we compare
A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology
1
Collect
Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.
2
Normalize
Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.
3
Compare
Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.
4
Explain
Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.
Still deciding between Aircall and Microsoft Teams?
Use Best communications software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.
- Independent criterion outcomes
- No invented scores or prices
- Affiliate links never change winners
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.