SoftwareGlimpse

Adapt.io vs Apollo.io

Compare Adapt.io and Apollo.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources11 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Adapt.io logo

Adapt.io

6.3/10

Regional B2B contact database with credit plans — Free; Starter $49/mo; Basic $99/mo; Custom contact sales; 7-day trial.

Best for

  • SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
  • Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
  • Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Adapt.io and Apollo.io. Choose Adapt.io when SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Adapt.io is better for

  • Ease of use

Apollo.io is better for

  • Contact data
  • Prospecting
  • Email outreach
  • Integrations

Tie

  • Value for money

Choose Adapt.io if: SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans

Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams

See detailed comparison ↓
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Adapt.io vs Apollo.io at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useAdapt.io

    Adapt.io

    Apollo.io

  • Contact dataApollo.io

    Adapt.io

    Apollo.io

  • ProspectingApollo.io

    Adapt.io

    Apollo.io

  • Email outreachApollo.io

    Adapt.io

    Apollo.io

  • IntegrationsApollo.io

    Adapt.io

    Apollo.io

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Adapt.io

    Best for ease of use

    Adapt.io leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for contact data

    Stronger lead management availability

  • Apollo.io

    Best for prospecting

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Apollo.io

    Best for email outreach

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (3/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Apollo.io wins

    Adapt.io

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

    Apollo.io

    Stronger lead management availability

  • Prospecting

    Apollo.io wins

    Adapt.io

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Email outreach

    Apollo.io wins

    Adapt.io

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (3/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Apollo.io wins

    Adapt.io

    Trails Apollo.io on this criterion

    Apollo.io

    Stronger coverage across crm sync, integrations, data export.

  • Value for money

    Tie

    Adapt.io

    Adapt.io and Apollo.io are close on value for money (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.io

    Adapt.io and Apollo.io are close on value for money (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Adapt.io if

  • SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
  • Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
  • Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app

Choose Apollo.io if

  • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Adapt.io and Apollo.io?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.