SoftwareGlimpse

ActiveCampaign vs Klaviyo

Compare ActiveCampaign and Klaviyo on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20265 evidence sources17 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
ActiveCampaign logo

ActiveCampaign

7.7/10

Email marketing automation ESP with multi-step journeys; CRM pipelines strongest on Plus+; contact-based pricing.

Best for

  • Marketing-led SMBs needing deep automation + CRM on Plus+
  • B2B/services teams comparing HubSpot/Keap for email-first GTM

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Klaviyo is the stronger overall fit

Choose Klaviyo when ecommerce catalog flows and SMS attribution are the job; choose ActiveCampaign when B2B/services multi-step automation + CRM pipelines are the job.

ActiveCampaign is better for

  • Integrations

Klaviyo is better for

  • Templates
  • Segmentation
  • Landing pages
  • Analytics

Tie

  • Automation

Choose ActiveCampaign if: Marketing-led SMBs needing deep automation + CRM on Plus+

Choose Klaviyo if: Ecommerce brands needing Shopify-native flows + SMS

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
Klaviyo logo

Klaviyo

7.9/10

Ecommerce email + SMS platform with Shopify-native flows, revenue attribution, and active-profile billing.

Best for

  • Ecommerce brands needing Shopify-native flows + SMS
  • Teams prioritizing revenue attribution analytics

Starting from $20.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

5

Criteria

10

Screenshots

17

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
ActiveCampaign PricingActiveCampaignofficial-pricing-page
ActiveCampaignActiveCampaignofficial-product-page
ActiveCampaign CRMActiveCampaignofficial-product-page
Klaviyo — Official SiteKlaviyoofficial-product-page
Klaviyo PricingKlaviyoofficial-pricing-page

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.