SoftwareGlimpse

ACT! vs Salesforce

Thesis: Same category, different company size — Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Same category, different company size. Choose ACT! only if your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape. Choose Salesforce only if your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape. Workflow advantage: ACT! leans contact-management; Salesforce leans sales-automation, complex-sales-processes. Trade-off: you gain focus on one product's motion at the cost of the other's adjacent coverage — no universal winner. Major differences: - Buyer thesis: Same category, different company size — Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. - Positioning: ACT! is ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).; Salesforce is Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and mid-market teams.. - Company-size focus: ACT! (micro, small-business) vs Salesforce (mid-market, enterprise). - Workflow coverage skew: ACT!-leaning contact-management vs Salesforce-leaning sales-automation, complex-sales-processes, inbound-sales. - Researched limits: ACT! — Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales; Salesforce — USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO.. Limitations — ACT!: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales; Legacy SMB brand vs modern cloud CRM UX expectations; Salesforce: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO.; Premier Support is an add-on on Pro Suite. Agentforce for Sales, Sales Programs, Revenue Intelligence, and Revenue Cloud are separate paid add-ons; some require Contact us.. Poor-fit cases: ACT! is a poor fit when that limitation bites: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales · Salesforce is a poor fit when that limitation bites: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO. · Avoid ACT! if you actually need Salesforce's motion (Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across ) Neither product has a completed hands-on product test on SoftwareGlimpse — this comparison is research/data-based only.

Independently recommendedLast updated Sep 11, 202611 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
ACT! logo

ACT!

5.6/10

ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).

Best for

  • your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape
  • use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motion

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

Same category, different company size. Choose ACT! only if your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape. Choose Salesforce only if your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape. Workflow advantage: ACT! leans contact-management; Salesforce leans sales-automation, complex-sales-processes. Trade-off: you gain focus on one product's motion at the cost of the other's adjacent coverage — no universal winner. ACT! is a poor fit when that limitation bites: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales Salesforce is a poor fit when that limitation bites: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO. Hard limitation for ACT! when it matters: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales. Hard limitation for Salesforce when it matters: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO.. Neither product has a completed hands-on product test on SoftwareGlimpse — this comparison is research/data-based only. Pricing threshold: estimate spend with the cost calculator before shortlisting.

ACT! is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Administration
  • Value for money

Salesforce is better for

  • Pipeline management
  • Sales automation
  • Email capabilities
  • Reporting

Choose ACT! if: your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape

Choose Salesforce if: your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape

See detailed comparison ↓
Salesforce logo

Salesforce

7.8/10

Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and mid-market teams.

Best for

  • your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape
  • use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motion

Starting from $25.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Quick verdict

Start here — then dig into the evidence below.

Choose ACT! if…

  • your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape
  • use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motion
  • You prioritize ease of use
  • You prioritize administration

Choose Salesforce if…

  • your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape
  • use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motion
  • You prioritize pipeline management
  • You prioritize sales automation

Overall recommendation

Same category, different company size. Choose ACT! only if your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape. Choose Salesforce only if your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape. Workflow advantage: ACT! leans contact-management; Salesforce leans sales-automation, complex-sales-processes. Trade-off: you gain focus on one product's motion at the cost of the other's adjacent coverage — no universal winner. ACT! is a poor fit when that limitation bites: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales Salesforce is a poor fit when that limitation bites: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO. Hard limitation for ACT! when it matters: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales. Hard limitation for Salesforce when it matters: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO.. Neither product has a completed hands-on product test on SoftwareGlimpse — this comparison is research/data-based only. Pricing threshold: estimate spend with the cost calculator before shortlisting.

Key trade-off

ACT! trades toward ease of use; Salesforce trades toward pipeline management.

Winner by category

Only dimensions with researched evidence for this pair.

DimensionWinnerWhy
Ease of useACT! winsACT! vs Salesforce on ease of use: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
SalesSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on pipeline management: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
AutomationSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on sales automation: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
Email capabilitiesSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on email capabilities: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
ReportingSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on reporting: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
CustomizationSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on customization: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
IntegrationsSalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on integrations: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
AdministrationACT! winsACT! vs Salesforce on administration: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
Enterprise suitabilitySalesforce winsACT! vs Salesforce on scalability: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
ValueACT! winsACT! vs Salesforce on value for money: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.

Side-by-side feature matrix

Normalized availability from product research — empty rows are not shown.

Core CRM

FeatureACT!Salesforce
Contact managementStrongStrong
Lead managementStrongStrong
Pipeline managementStrongStrong
Deal managementStrongStrong

Sales engagement

FeatureACT!Salesforce
Email syncStrongStrong
Email trackingStrongStrong
Email sequencesNot evidencedModerate
Call functionalityNot evidencedModerate
Workflow automationModerateStrong
Sales automationStrongStrong
Lead scoringNot evidencedStrong

Reporting

FeatureACT!Salesforce
ReportingModerateStrong
ForecastingNot evidencedModerate

Platform

FeatureACT!Salesforce
IntegrationsStrongStrong
Custom fieldsStrongStrong
Custom pipelinesModerateStrong
Mobile appStrongStrong
AI assistanceNot evidencedStrong

Additional capabilities

FeatureACT!Salesforce
Data enrichmentNot evidencedModerate
ProspectingNot evidencedModerate
Meeting schedulingNot evidencedModerate
Email campaignsNot evidencedStrong

Pricing comparison

Pricing evidence last checked Aug 16, 2026.

ACT! logo

ACT!

No free planFree trial available
  • ACT! (contact sales)Custom
Salesforce logo

Salesforce

From $25.00/user/mo

Free plan availableFree trial available
  • Free Suite$0.00/user/mo
  • Starter Suite$25.00/user/mo
  • Pro Suite$100.00/user/mo
  • Enterprise$175.00/user/mo
  • Unlimited$350.00/user/mo

Seat-count estimates

Labeled estimates from verified starting per-seat pricing — not invoices.

SeatsACT!Salesforce
5~$125.00/mo (Starter Suite × 5)
10~$250.00/mo (Starter Suite × 10)
25~$625.00/mo (Starter Suite × 25)
50~$1,250.00/mo (Starter Suite × 50)

Estimate from verified starting per-seat pricing — actual total depends on plan, annual discounts, and add-ons.

Starting prices not verified for either product Model team cost scenarios in the crm cost calculator Cost calculator: /tools/crm-cost-calculator/

Open cost calculator →

Best for

Scenario picks from researched strengths — not a universal ranking.

  • Depends

    Prefer ACT! when your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape

    Prefer ACT! when your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape

  • Depends

    Prefer ACT! when use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motion

    Prefer ACT! when use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motion

  • Depends

    Prefer Salesforce when your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape

    Prefer Salesforce when your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape

  • Depends

    Prefer Salesforce when use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motion

    Prefer Salesforce when use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motion

  • ACT!

    Best for ease of use

    ACT! vs Salesforce on ease of use: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.

  • ACT!

    Best for administration

    ACT! vs Salesforce on administration: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.

The differences that actually matter

Pair-specific analysis for ACT! vs Salesforce — not generic category copy.

  • Pipeline management

    Salesforce ahead

    On pipeline management, Salesforce is ahead. ACT!: Trails Salesforce on this criterion. Salesforce: ACT! vs Salesforce on pipeline management: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.. Feature evidence also diverges on Workflow automation (ACT!: Moderate; Salesforce: Strong); Reporting (ACT!: Moderate; Salesforce: Strong); Custom pipelines (ACT!: Moderate; Salesforce: Strong).

  • Email capabilities

    Salesforce ahead

    On email capabilities, Salesforce is ahead. ACT!: Trails Salesforce on this criterion. Salesforce: ACT! vs Salesforce on email capabilities: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above..

  • Sales automation

    Salesforce ahead

    On sales automation, Salesforce is ahead. ACT!: Trails Salesforce on this criterion. Salesforce: ACT! vs Salesforce on sales automation: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above..

  • Reporting

    Salesforce ahead

    On reporting, Salesforce is ahead. ACT!: Trails Salesforce on this criterion. Salesforce: ACT! vs Salesforce on reporting: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above..

  • Value for money

    ACT! ahead

    On value for money, ACT! is ahead. ACT!: ACT! vs Salesforce on value for money: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.. Salesforce: Trails ACT! on this criterion.

Pros and cons

Product-specific for this pair — derived from researched outcomes and editorial notes.

ACT! logo

ACT!

Pros

  • Stronger on ease of use
  • Stronger on administration
  • Stronger on value for money

Cons

  • Trails on pipeline management
  • Trails on sales automation
  • Trails on email capabilities
Salesforce logo

Salesforce

Pros

  • Stronger on pipeline management
  • Stronger on sales automation
  • Stronger on email capabilities
  • Stronger on reporting

Cons

  • Trails on ease of use
  • Trails on administration
  • Trails on value for money

Implementation & learning curve

Based on researched setup / ease criteria for this pair.

ACT!

  • Stronger on ease of use: ACT! vs Salesforce on ease of use: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
  • Stronger on administration: ACT! vs Salesforce on administration: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.

Salesforce

  • Trails on ease of use relative to ACT!
  • Trails on administration relative to ACT!

Integrations

Overlaps and exclusives from product integration data when available.

ACT!: Strong. Salesforce: Strong.

Who should not choose each product

Decision quality improves when we say who should walk away.

Don't choose ACT! if…

  • You need Salesforce's stronger pipeline management more than ACT!'s strengths
  • You need Salesforce's stronger sales automation more than ACT!'s strengths
  • You need Salesforce's stronger email capabilities more than ACT!'s strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape

Don't choose Salesforce if…

  • You need ACT!'s stronger ease of use more than Salesforce's strengths
  • You need ACT!'s stronger administration more than Salesforce's strengths
  • You need ACT!'s stronger value for money more than Salesforce's strengths
  • Your primary fit looks closer to: your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape

Alternatives worth considering

When neither product is the right fit.

  • AI-powered customer platform with free forever CRM, plus paid Smart CRM seats and Sales/Marketing/Service hubs for growing teams.

  • Pipeline-first sales CRM for visual deal management, activity-based selling, and growing sales teams.

  • Simple small-business CRM for contacts, sales pipelines, tasks, and lightweight automation without enterprise complexity.

  • Freshworks sales CRM for lead management and pipeline workflows.

Final verdict

Scenario-level close — not a repeat of the intro.

ACT! wins when…

your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape

Salesforce wins when…

your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape

  • Prefer ACT! when your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shapeDepends
  • Prefer ACT! when use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motionDepends
  • Prefer Salesforce when your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shapeDepends
  • Prefer Salesforce when use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motionDepends

Which one should you choose?

Choose ACT! if:

  • your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape
  • use-case priority is contact-management and Salesforce is secondary for that motion

Choose Salesforce if:

  • your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape
  • use-case priority is pipeline-management and ACT! is secondary for that motion

Product screenshots

Real product UI from our media library — no placeholders.

Salesforce

  • Sales Cloud product view from the official Sales Cloud marketing site.
  • Pipeline management UI from the Sales Cloud features page.
  • Forecast management UI from official Sales Cloud features.
  • Lead management UI from official Sales Cloud features.

FAQ

Is ACT! better than Salesforce?
Same category, different company size. Choose ACT! only if your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape. Choose Salesforce only if your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape. Workflow advantage: ACT! leans contact-management; Salesforce leans sales-automation, complex-sales-processes. Trade-off: you gain focus on one product's motion at the cost of the other's adjacent coverage — no universal winner. ACT! is a poor fit when that limitation bites: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales Salesforce is a poor fit when that limitation bites: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO. Hard limitation for ACT! when it matters: Precise public list pricing not asserted — contact sales. Hard limitation for Salesforce when it matters: USD list pricing rises quickly: Pro Suite $100, Enterprise $175, Unlimited $350 per user/month (annual). Add-ons (Agentforce for Sales from $125 Contact us, Revenue Intelligence, Success Plans) increase TCO.. Neither product has a completed hands-on product test on SoftwareGlimpse — this comparison is research/data-based only. Pricing threshold: estimate spend with the cost calculator before shortlisting.
Which is easier to use?
ACT! vs Salesforce on ease of use: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to ACT! on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
Which CRM fits which team?
ACT!: your buying job matches “ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).” rather than Salesforce's shape Salesforce: your buying job matches “Enterprise CRM platform for sales, service, marketing, and customer data across large and ” rather than ACT!'s shape
Which is stronger for sales automation?
ACT! vs Salesforce on sales automation: Both sit in crm, but documented company-size audiences diverge. Decision edge to Salesforce on this criterion for this pair — unlike a generic feature matrix, the hinge is the buyer job above.
Does ACT! or Salesforce have a free plan?
ACT!: No free plan. Salesforce: Free plan available.
How does ACT! vs Salesforce pricing compare?
Salesforce starts from $25.00/user/mo. Confirm live vendor pricing before purchasing.
How did SoftwareGlimpse compare these products?
We map both products to the same category criteria, then evaluate trade-offs using verified product, pricing and feature evidence. Affiliate relationships never change outcomes.

Still deciding between ACT! and Salesforce?

Use Find My CRM for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.

Part of CRM Software hub · Software comparisons

Try a decision tool

Interactive helpers use recommendation criteria — affiliate status never changes outcomes.