SoftwareGlimpse

Microsoft Teams vs OpenPhone

Compare Microsoft Teams and OpenPhone on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

7.3/10

M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.

Best for

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Microsoft Teams is better for

  • CRM / CTI integrations

OpenPhone is better for

  • Number / country coverage
  • Power dialer
  • Routing & IVR
  • Analytics

Tie

  • WhatsApp Business
  • AI features

Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Choose OpenPhone if: SMB teams that want a modern shared business number with SMS and AI answering

See detailed comparison ↓
OpenPhone logo

OpenPhone

7.5/10

Modern SMB shared business phone (also branded Quo) with shared numbers, SMS and Sona AI — Starter from $15/user/month annual.

Best for

  • SMB teams that want a modern shared business number with SMS and AI answering
  • Founders and small sales/support teams who need transparent per-seat pricing without a 3-licence floor
  • Teams standardising on HubSpot/Salesforce once they move to Business

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

Pros & cons

A balanced look at where each product shines — and where it falls short.

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Strengths in green

Pros

  • Stronger on crm / cti integrations

Cons

  • Trails on number / country coverage
  • Trails on power dialer
  • Trails on routing & ivr

Best for

Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

OpenPhone logo

OpenPhone

Trade-offs in red

Pros

  • Stronger on number / country coverage
  • Stronger on power dialer
  • Stronger on routing & ivr
  • Stronger on analytics

Cons

  • Trails on crm / cti integrations

Best for

SMB teams that want a modern shared business number with SMS and AI answering

Choose if…

Choose Microsoft Teams if

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Choose OpenPhone if

  • SMB teams that want a modern shared business number with SMS and AI answering
  • Founders and small sales/support teams who need transparent per-seat pricing without a 3-licence floor
  • Teams standardising on HubSpot/Salesforce once they move to Business

Still unsure which fits?

Answer a few buyer questions and get a shortlist matched to your priorities.

Best communications software

Or compare another pair.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.