SoftwareGlimpse

Linear vs Todoist

Compare Linear and Todoist on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Linear logo

Linear

7.9/10

Modern issue tracker for product/engineering teams — Free limited; Basic from ~$8/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
  • Startups replacing Jira complexity
  • Issue-centric software delivery

Starting from $8.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Linear and Todoist. Choose Linear when Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX. Choose Todoist when Personal productivity and to-do capture. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Linear is better for

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Automations
  • Collaboration
  • AI features

Todoist is better for

  • Ease of use
  • Value for money

Tie

  • Free plan
  • Integrations

Choose Linear if: Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX

Choose Todoist if: Personal productivity and to-do capture

See detailed comparison ↓
Todoist logo

Todoist

6.4/10

Personal and team task manager with natural-language capture — Free; Pro from ~$6.25/user/mo annual; Business ~$10.

Best for

  • Personal productivity and to-do capture
  • Light team task lists on Business
  • Buyers who want natural-language tasks

Starting from $6.25/user/mo

Free plan available

Linear vs Todoist at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Linear

    Todoist

  • Seat / licence minimumDepends

    Linear

    Todoist

  • Free planTie

    Linear

    Todoist

  • Ease of useTodoist

    Linear

    Todoist

  • Timeline / GanttLinear

    Linear

    Todoist

Which project management is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Linear

    Best for timeline / gantt

    Linear leads on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Linear

    Best for automations

    Linear leads on automations (7/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Linear

    Best for collaboration

    Linear leads on collaboration (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Todoist

    Best for ease of use

    Todoist leads on ease of use (9/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Todoist

    Best for value for money

    Todoist leads on value for money (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Linear

    Linear researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched; Todoist researched starting price from $6.25/mo; a free plan is researched. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    Todoist

    Linear researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched; Todoist researched starting price from $6.25/mo; a free plan is researched. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

  • Seat / licence minimum

    Depends

    Linear

    Check paid seat floors for Linear and Todoist on current vendor packaging.

    Todoist

    Check paid seat floors for Linear and Todoist on current vendor packaging.

  • Timeline / Gantt

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Todoist

    Trails Linear on this criterion

  • Automations

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on automations (7/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Todoist

    Trails Linear on this criterion

  • Integrations

    Tie

    Linear

    Linear and Todoist are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Todoist

    Linear and Todoist are close on integrations (8/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Reporting

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on reporting (7/10 vs 4/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Todoist

    Trails Linear on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Linear if

  • Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
  • Startups replacing Jira complexity
  • Issue-centric software delivery

Choose Todoist if

  • Personal productivity and to-do capture
  • Light team task lists on Business
  • Buyers who want natural-language tasks

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Linear and Todoist?

Use Best project management software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.