SoftwareGlimpse

Hive vs Microsoft Project

Compare Hive and Microsoft Project on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources4 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Hive logo

Hive

7.6/10

Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.

Best for

  • SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday
  • Teams that can start on Free (≤10) before upgrading to Teams
  • Buyers comparing monday.com as a primary Work OS peer

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Hive and Microsoft Project. Choose Hive when SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday. Choose Microsoft Project when Microsoft 365 standardised orgs. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Hive is better for

  • Free plan
  • Ease of use
  • Automations
  • Collaboration

Microsoft Project is better for

  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Integrations
  • Reporting

Choose Hive if: SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday

Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs

See detailed comparison ↓
Microsoft Project logo

Microsoft Project

7.4/10

Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.

Best for

  • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
  • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
  • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans

Starting from $10.00/user/mo

No free plan

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Hive and Microsoft Project. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Depends

    Hive researched starting price from $5/mo; a free plan is researched; Microsoft Project researched starting price from $10/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    HiveDepends
    Microsoft ProjectDepends
  • Seat / licence minimum

    Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.

    Depends

    Check paid seat floors for Hive and Microsoft Project on current vendor packaging.

    HiveDepends
    Microsoft ProjectDepends
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Hive

    Hive researches a free plan; Microsoft Project does not research a free plan.

    HiveStronger
    Microsoft ProjectWeaker
  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Hive

    Hive leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive8/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Timeline / Gantt

    Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on timeline gantt (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive8/10
    Microsoft Project9/10
  • Automations

    Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.

    Hive

    Hive leads on automations (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive8/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Collaboration

    Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.

    Hive

    Hive leads on collaboration (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive8/10
    Microsoft Project7/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on integrations (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    Microsoft Project9/10
  • AI features

    Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.

    Hive

    Hive leads on ai features (7/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    Microsoft Project6/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    Microsoft Project

    Microsoft Project leads on reporting (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    Microsoft Project8/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Hive

    Hive leads on value for money (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Hive8/10
    Microsoft Project6/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.