Hive vs Microsoft Project
Compare Hive and Microsoft Project on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Hive
Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.
Best for
- • SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday
- • Teams that can start on Free (≤10) before upgrading to Teams
- • Buyers comparing monday.com as a primary Work OS peer
Starting from $5.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Hive and Microsoft Project. Choose Hive when SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday. Choose Microsoft Project when Microsoft 365 standardised orgs. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Hive is better for
- ✓ Free plan
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ Collaboration
Microsoft Project is better for
- ✓ Timeline / Gantt
- ✓ Integrations
- ✓ Reporting
Choose Hive if: SMB and mid-market teams wanting Work OS depth with a lower paid entry than monday
Choose Microsoft Project if: Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
Microsoft Project
Microsoft 365 project / Planner ladder for Gantt, resources and portfolios — Planner Plan 1 from ~$10/user/mo.
Best for
- • Microsoft 365 standardised orgs
- • Traditional PMO Gantt/resource needs
- • Enterprise portfolio planning on higher plans
Starting from $10.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
4
Criteria
11
Screenshots
4
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Hive — Official Site | Hive | official-product-page |
| Hive Pricing | Hive | official-pricing-page |
| Microsoft Project — Official Site | Microsoft Project | official-product-page |
| Microsoft Project Pricing | Microsoft Project | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.