SoftwareGlimpse

Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams

Compare Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20266 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Grasshopper logo

Grasshopper

6.2/10

SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).

Best for

  • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
  • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
  • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line

Starting from $14.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Grasshopper is better for

  • Number / country coverage
  • Power dialer
  • Routing & IVR

Microsoft Teams is better for

  • CRM / CTI integrations
  • Analytics
  • AI features

Tie

  • WhatsApp Business

Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number

Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

See detailed comparison ↓
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

7.3/10

M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.

Best for

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

Grasshopper

Microsoft Teams

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.