Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
Compare Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Grasshopper
SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).
Best for
- • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Starting from $14.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Grasshopper is better for
- ✓ Number / country coverage
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ Routing & IVR
Microsoft Teams is better for
- ✓ CRM / CTI integrations
- ✓ Analytics
- ✓ AI features
Tie
- • WhatsApp Business
Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Microsoft Teams
M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.
Best for
- • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Starting from $0.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Comparison scorecard
Criterion-by-criterion results for Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.
- Depends
Starting pricing
Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.
Grasshopper researched starting price from $14/mo; Microsoft Teams researched starting price from $0/mo; a free plan is researched. Better value depends on seat minimums and add-ons.
GrasshopperDependsMicrosoft TeamsDepends - Depends
User / licence minimum
Seat floors, per-employee minimums, and small-team pricing traps.
Check seat or licence minimums for Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams on current vendor packaging — not inferred beyond researched pricing notes.
GrasshopperDependsMicrosoft TeamsDepends - Grasshopper
Number / country coverage
Published local numbers and country coverage.
Stronger cloud phone availability
GrasshopperStrongerMicrosoft TeamsWeaker - Grasshopper
Power dialer
Power or parallel dialing for outbound teams.
Grasshopper leads on power dialer (4/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
GrasshopperStrongerMicrosoft TeamsWeaker - Tie
WhatsApp Business
WhatsApp Business API / BSP capability.
Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams have the same researched availability on whatsapp business (Grasshopper: not-supported; Microsoft Teams: not-supported).
GrasshopperTieMicrosoft TeamsTie - Microsoft Teams
CRM / CTI integrations
CRM click-to-call, logging, and CTI depth.
Microsoft Teams leads on crm integrations (5/10 vs 10/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
GrasshopperWeakerMicrosoft TeamsStronger - Grasshopper
Routing & IVR
Call routing, IVR, queues, and skills-based assignment.
Grasshopper leads on routing (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
GrasshopperStrongerMicrosoft TeamsWeaker - Microsoft Teams
Analytics
Campaign, conversation, or workforce reporting depth.
Microsoft Teams leads on analytics (5/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Grasshopper5/10Microsoft Teams6/10 - Microsoft Teams
AI features
Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.
Microsoft Teams leads on ai features (6/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.
Grasshopper6/10Microsoft Teams8/10
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.