Grasshopper vs Microsoft Teams
Compare Grasshopper and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Grasshopper
SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).
Best for
- • Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- • SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- • Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Starting from $14.00/user/mo
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.
Grasshopper is better for
- ✓ Number / country coverage
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ Routing & IVR
Microsoft Teams is better for
- ✓ CRM / CTI integrations
- ✓ Analytics
- ✓ AI features
Tie
- • WhatsApp Business
Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Microsoft Teams
M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.
Best for
- • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Starting from $0.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Pros & cons
A balanced look at where each product shines — and where it falls short.
Grasshopper
Strengths in greenPros
- Stronger on number / country coverage
- Stronger on power dialer
- Stronger on routing & ivr
Cons
- Trails on crm / cti integrations
- Trails on analytics
- Trails on ai features
Best for
Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
Microsoft Teams
Trade-offs in redPros
- Stronger on crm / cti integrations
- Stronger on analytics
- Stronger on ai features
Cons
- Trails on number / country coverage
- Trails on power dialer
- Trails on routing & ivr
Best for
Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
Choose if…
Choose Grasshopper if
- Solo operators and tiny teams that primarily need a professional virtual number
- SMBs that want flat account pricing instead of per-seat UCaaS maths
- Buyers replacing a personal mobile with a branded business line
Choose Microsoft Teams if
- Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
- Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
- IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features
Still unsure which fits?
Answer a few buyer questions and get a shortlist matched to your priorities.
Best communications softwareSome visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.