SoftwareGlimpse

Cognism vs Lusha

Compare Cognism and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 202613 evidence sources19 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Stronger overall fit
Cognism logo

Cognism

6.9/10

Compliance-first B2B sales intelligence with phone-verified Diamond Data® mobiles, strong EMEA coverage, and CRM enrichment — quote-led Sales Prospecting plans.

Best for

  • Phone-verified mobiles and EMEA/compliance-first data quality
  • Teams that already sequence email outside the SI tool

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Cognism is the stronger overall fit

Cognism fits phone-verified, compliance-led contact data and stronger prospecting depth; Lusha fits lighter enrichment plus modest in-product outreach when Cognism’s email-outreach gap is a non-issue because you sequence elsewhere.

Cognism is better for

  • Contact data
  • Prospecting
  • Integrations
  • Value for money

Lusha is better for

  • Email outreach

Tie

  • Ease of use

Choose Cognism if: Phone-verified mobiles and EMEA/compliance-first data quality

Choose Lusha if: SMB/mid-market enrichment with lighter packaging

See detailed comparison ↓
Lusha logo

Lusha

5.6/10

B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.

Best for

  • SMB/mid-market enrichment with lighter packaging
  • Buyers who want some outreach capability alongside reveals

Free plan available

Cognism vs Lusha at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Ease of useTie

    Cognism

    Lusha

  • Contact dataCognism

    Cognism

    Lusha

  • ProspectingCognism

    Cognism

    Lusha

  • Email outreachLusha

    Cognism

    Lusha

  • IntegrationsCognism

    Cognism

    Lusha

Which sales intelligence is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Cognism

    Best for contact data

    Cognism leads on contact-data (9/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Cognism

    Best for prospecting

    Cognism leads on prospecting (8/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Cognism

    Best for integrations

    Cognism leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Lusha

    Best for email outreach

    Lusha leads on email-outreach (3/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Contact data

    Cognism wins

    Cognism

    Cognism leads on contact-data (9/10 vs 8/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Trails Cognism on this criterion

  • Prospecting

    Cognism wins

    Cognism

    Cognism leads on prospecting (8/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Trails Cognism on this criterion

  • Email outreach

    Lusha wins

    Cognism

    Trails Lusha on this criterion

    Lusha

    Lusha leads on email-outreach (3/10 vs 6/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Cognism wins

    Cognism

    Cognism leads on integrations (8/10 vs 7/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Trails Cognism on this criterion

  • Value for money

    Cognism wins

    Cognism

    Cognism leads on value-for-money (6/10 vs 5/10) based on SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Lusha

    Trails Cognism on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Cognism if

  • Phone-verified mobiles and EMEA/compliance-first data quality
  • Teams that already sequence email outside the SI tool

Choose Lusha if

  • SMB/mid-market enrichment with lighter packaging
  • Buyers who want some outreach capability alongside reveals

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Cognism and Lusha?

Use Best sales intelligence software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.