Clay vs Lusha
Compare Clay and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Clay
GTM data enrichment and workflow platform for multi-provider waterfall prospecting — Free + Launch from ~$167/mo headline, Growth, Enterprise.
Best for
- • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
- • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
- • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer
Starting from $167.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Clay and Lusha. Choose Clay when GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls. Choose Lusha when SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Clay is better for
- ✓ Prospecting
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Value for money
Lusha is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
Tie
- • Integrations
Choose Clay if: GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
Choose Lusha if: SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment
Lusha
B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.
Best for
- • SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment
- • RevOps cleaning CRM records and automating enrichment
- • Teams already standardized on Salesforce/HubSpot/Pipedrive
Free plan available
Screenshots
Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.
Clay
Lusha
Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.