SoftwareGlimpse

Clay vs Lusha

Compare Clay and Lusha on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 202612 evidence sources16 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Clay logo

Clay

7.3/10

GTM data enrichment and workflow platform for multi-provider waterfall prospecting — Free + Launch from ~$167/mo headline, Growth, Enterprise.

Best for

  • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
  • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
  • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer

Starting from $167.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Clay and Lusha. Choose Clay when GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls. Choose Lusha when SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Clay is better for

  • Prospecting
  • Email outreach
  • Value for money

Lusha is better for

  • Ease of use

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose Clay if: GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls

Choose Lusha if: SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment

See detailed comparison ↓
Lusha logo

Lusha

5.6/10

B2B data intelligence platform for verified contact/company data, enrichment, signals, and Engage outreach sequences.

Best for

  • SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment
  • RevOps cleaning CRM records and automating enrichment
  • Teams already standardized on Salesforce/HubSpot/Pipedrive

Free plan available

Pros & cons

A balanced look at where each product shines — and where it falls short.

Clay logo

Clay

Strengths in green

Pros

  • Stronger on prospecting
  • Stronger on email outreach
  • Stronger on value for money

Cons

  • Trails on ease of use

Best for

GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls

Lusha logo

Lusha

Trade-offs in red

Pros

  • Stronger on ease of use

Cons

  • Trails on prospecting
  • Trails on email outreach
  • Trails on value for money

Best for

SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment

Choose if…

Choose Clay if

  • GTM engineers and RevOps teams building multi-provider enrichment waterfalls
  • Growth teams that want Claygent-style AI research inside prospecting workflows
  • Buyers consolidating many data vendors into one orchestration layer

Choose Lusha if

  • SDR/BDR teams needing verified emails/dials and enrichment
  • RevOps cleaning CRM records and automating enrichment
  • Teams already standardized on Salesforce/HubSpot/Pipedrive

Still unsure which fits?

Answer a few buyer questions and get a shortlist matched to your priorities.

Best sales intelligence software

Or compare another pair.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.