SoftwareGlimpse

Campaign Monitor vs Mailchimp

Compare Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20268 evidence sources13 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Campaign Monitor logo

Campaign Monitor

7/10

Design-led email marketing by Marigold with contact-tier Lite, Essentials, Premier, and Enterprise.

Best for

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

Campaign Monitor is better for

  • Automation
  • Landing pages

Tie

  • Templates
  • Analytics
  • Integrations

Choose Campaign Monitor if: Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates

Choose Mailchimp if: Marketing teams needing email + audience CRM features

See detailed comparison ↓
Mailchimp logo

Mailchimp

6.8/10

Email marketing with CRM features; freemium entry (secondary category: marketing).

Best for

  • Marketing teams needing email + audience CRM features
  • SMBs starting on freemium email marketing
  • Buyers prioritizing campaigns over sales pipelines

Starting from $13.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Campaign Monitor vs Mailchimp at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Mailchimp

  • Contact / subscriber limitsDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Mailchimp

  • Email send limitsDepends

    Campaign Monitor

    Mailchimp

  • AutomationCampaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor

    Mailchimp

  • TemplatesTie

    Campaign Monitor

    Mailchimp

Which email marketing is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Campaign Monitor

    Best for automation

    Campaign Monitor leads on automation (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Campaign Monitor

    Best for landing pages

    Stronger coverage across landing pages.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Mailchimp researched starting price from $13/mo; a free plan is researched. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

    Mailchimp

    Campaign Monitor researched starting price from $13/mo; Mailchimp researched starting price from $13/mo; a free plan is researched. Contact-based packaging can change the real TCO.

  • Automation

    Campaign Monitor wins

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor leads on automation (6/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailchimp

    Trails Campaign Monitor on this criterion

  • Segmentation

    Depends

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor vs Mailchimp on segmentation is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.

    Mailchimp

    Campaign Monitor vs Mailchimp on segmentation is not a scored universal winner in current research — choose by job fit.

  • Analytics

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailchimp

    Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp are close on analytics (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Templates

    Tie

    Campaign Monitor

    Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp are close on templates (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Mailchimp

    Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp are close on templates (9/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

Which should you choose?

Choose Campaign Monitor if

  • Brand-conscious teams prioritizing email design/templates
  • Agencies needing client/subaccount tooling (higher plans)
  • Marketers wanting AI writer/booster and benchmarked campaign insights

Choose Mailchimp if

  • Marketing teams needing email + audience CRM features
  • SMBs starting on freemium email marketing
  • Buyers prioritizing campaigns over sales pipelines

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Campaign Monitor and Mailchimp?

Use Best email marketing software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.