SoftwareGlimpse

CallHippo vs Microsoft Teams

Compare CallHippo and Microsoft Teams on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20268 evidence sources9 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
CallHippo logo

CallHippo

7.2/10

SMB cloud phone system with a $0 starter rung, Starter from $18/user/month annual (2-user minimum), call recording and IVR from Professional, plus a separate call-centre plan ladder.

Best for

  • SMB and micro teams that need a real phone system with a low entry price and no 3-seat floor
  • Growing sales teams that want unlimited domestic calling plus recording and IVR around $30/user/month
  • Buyers who want a self-serve trial and a $0 starting rung before committing budget

Starting from $18.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

CallHippo is better for

  • Number / country coverage
  • Power dialer
  • WhatsApp Business
  • Routing & IVR

Microsoft Teams is better for

  • CRM / CTI integrations
  • AI features

Choose CallHippo if: SMB and micro teams that need a real phone system with a low entry price and no 3-seat floor

Choose Microsoft Teams if: Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

See detailed comparison ↓
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

7.3/10

M365 collaboration hub (chat, meetings, files) with optional Teams Phone telephony add-on — free Teams tier exists; Phone Standard ~$10/user/month annual plus PSTN.

Best for

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Starting from $0.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Pros & cons

A balanced look at where each product shines — and where it falls short.

CallHippo logo

CallHippo

Strengths in green

Pros

  • Stronger on number / country coverage
  • Stronger on power dialer
  • Stronger on whatsapp business
  • Stronger on routing & ivr

Cons

  • Trails on crm / cti integrations
  • Trails on ai features

Best for

SMB and micro teams that need a real phone system with a low entry price and no 3-seat floor

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Trade-offs in red

Pros

  • Stronger on crm / cti integrations
  • Stronger on ai features

Cons

  • Trails on number / country coverage
  • Trails on power dialer
  • Trails on whatsapp business

Best for

Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub

Choose if…

Choose CallHippo if

  • SMB and micro teams that need a real phone system with a low entry price and no 3-seat floor
  • Growing sales teams that want unlimited domestic calling plus recording and IVR around $30/user/month
  • Buyers who want a self-serve trial and a $0 starting rung before committing budget

Choose Microsoft Teams if

  • Organisations standardised on Microsoft 365 that need chat and meetings as the collaboration hub
  • Enterprises that may add Teams Phone later for PSTN without changing collaboration vendors
  • IT-led rollouts that prioritise identity, compliance and app ecosystem over dialer features

Still unsure which fits?

Answer a few buyer questions and get a shortlist matched to your priorities.

Best communications software

Or compare another pair.

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.