CallHippo vs Grasshopper
Compare CallHippo and Grasshopper on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
CallHippo
SMB cloud phone system with a $0 starter rung, Starter from $18/user/month annual (2-user minimum), call recording and IVR from Professional, plus a separate call-centre plan ladder.
Best for
- • SMB teams needing IVR, recording and CRM logging
- • Buyers who want WhatsApp alongside calling
Starting from $18.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
Different jobs under the SMB phone umbrella. Grasshopper wins for the simplest affordable virtual business number; CallHippo wins when you need a real SMB phone system with IVR, recording, CRM logging and optional WhatsApp. Do not treat Grasshopper as a CallHippo feature peer.
CallHippo is better for
- ✓ Power dialer
- ✓ WhatsApp Business
- ✓ CRM / CTI integrations
- ✓ Routing & IVR
Tie
- • Number / country coverage
- • AI features
Choose CallHippo if: SMB teams needing IVR, recording and CRM logging
Choose Grasshopper if: Solo operators who mainly need a professional virtual number
Grasshopper
SMB virtual business numbers with extensions and apps — True Solo from $14/month annual (flat account, not per seat).
Best for
- • Solo operators who mainly need a professional virtual number
- • Buyers who want flat account pricing instead of per-seat maths
Starting from $14.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
6
Criteria
9
Screenshots
8
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| CallHippo — Official Site | CallHippo | official-product-page |
| CallHippo Pricing | CallHippo | official-pricing-page |
| CallHippo Unlimited Calling Exemption List | CallHippo | official-product-page |
| CallHippo WhatsApp Business API | CallHippo | official-product-page |
| Grasshopper — Official Site | Grasshopper | official-product-page |
| Grasshopper Pricing | Grasshopper | official-pricing-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.