SoftwareGlimpse

Apollo.io vs Reply.io

Compare Apollo.io and Reply.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20267 evidence sources17 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • Teams that want a free tier before buying
  • Buyers prioritizing prospecting database breadth

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

Reply.io is the stronger overall fit

Apollo is stronger when free-tier evaluation and prospecting database depth matter; Reply is stronger when multichannel sequences (email/LinkedIn/calls/SMS/WhatsApp) and AI outreach are the core job.

Apollo.io is better for

  • Contact data

Reply.io is better for

  • Email outreach
  • Integrations

Tie

  • Ease of use
  • Prospecting
  • Value for money

Choose Apollo.io if: Teams that want a free tier before buying

Choose Reply.io if: SDR teams running true multichannel cadences

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
Reply.io logo

Reply.io

7.6/10

AI sales engagement platform for multichannel outbound across email, LinkedIn, calls, SMS, and WhatsApp with built-in B2B data.

Best for

  • SDR teams running true multichannel cadences
  • Agencies needing multichannel + AI SDR packaging

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

No free plan

Evidence & transparency

Sources and research process behind this comparison.

Sources

7

Criteria

6

Screenshots

17

Sources consulted

TitleProductType
Apollo.io PricingApollo.ioofficial-pricing-page
Apollo.ioApollo.ioofficial-product-page
Apollo ConversationsApollo.ioofficial-product-page
Reply.io PricingReply.ioofficial-pricing-page
Reply.ioReply.ioofficial-product-page
Reply.io Pricing (archived fixture)Reply.iofixture
Reply.io Product (archived fixture)Reply.iofixture

Methodology steps

  1. 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
  2. 2Map both products to the same category criteria
  3. 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
  4. 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing

Methodology version 1.0.0.

Independent

Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.

Read full methodology →

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.