SoftwareGlimpse

Apollo.io vs Kaspr

Compare Apollo.io and Kaspr on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources14 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Apollo.io
Read review

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Apollo.io and Kaspr. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Choose Kaspr when EMEA/EU-leaning SMB and mid-market teams prospecting via LinkedIn + Chrome. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Apollo.io is better for

  • ✓ Contact data
  • ✓ Prospecting
  • ✓ Email outreach

Kaspr is better for

  • ✓ Ease of use

Tie

  • • Integrations
  • • Value for money

Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams

Choose Kaspr if: EMEA/EU-leaning SMB and mid-market teams prospecting via LinkedIn + Chrome

See detailed comparison ↓
Kaspr logo

Kaspr

6.3/10

LinkedIn-centric EU/EMEA B2B contact capture (Chrome) — Free plan; Starter from $49/mo annual headline.

Best for

  • • EMEA/EU-leaning SMB and mid-market teams prospecting via LinkedIn + Chrome
  • • Buyers who want Free evaluation and clear annual Starter/Business headlines
  • • Teams that need phone/email reveals into CRM more than a built-in sequencer

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Kaspr
Read review

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Apollo.io and Kaspr. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Kaspr

    Kaspr leads on ease of use (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.io7/10
    Kaspr8/10

  • Contact data

    Coverage and quality of contact data.

    Apollo.io

    Stronger data enrichment availability

    Apollo.ioStronger
    KasprWeaker

  • Prospecting

    Prospecting workflow strength.

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.ioStronger
    KasprWeaker

  • Email outreach

    Outreach sequencing and deliverability tooling.

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (8/10 vs 3/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.ioStronger
    KasprWeaker

  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Tie

    Apollo.io and Kaspr are close on integrations (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.ioTie
    KasprTie

  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Tie

    Apollo.io and Kaspr are close on value for money (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Apollo.io7/10
    Kaspr7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.