SoftwareGlimpse

Adapt.io vs Apollo.io

Compare Adapt.io and Apollo.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources11 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Adapt.io logo

Adapt.io

6.3/10

Regional B2B contact database with credit plans — Free; Starter $49/mo; Basic $99/mo; Custom contact sales; 7-day trial.

Best for

  • • SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
  • • Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
  • • Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Adapt.io
Read review

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Adapt.io and Apollo.io. Choose Adapt.io when SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Adapt.io is better for

  • ✓ Ease of use

Apollo.io is better for

  • ✓ Contact data
  • ✓ Prospecting
  • ✓ Email outreach
  • ✓ Integrations

Tie

  • • Value for money

Choose Adapt.io if: SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans

Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams

See detailed comparison ↓
Apollo.io logo

Apollo.io

6.9/10

Best for

  • • Outbound and growth sales teams
  • • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
  • • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards

Starting from $49.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Visit Apollo.io
Read review

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Adapt.io and Apollo.io. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    Adapt.io

    Adapt.io leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Adapt.io8/10
    Apollo.io7/10

  • Contact data

    Coverage and quality of contact data.

    Apollo.io

    Stronger lead management availability

    Adapt.ioWeaker
    Apollo.ioStronger

  • Prospecting

    Prospecting workflow strength.

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on prospecting (7/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Adapt.ioWeaker
    Apollo.ioStronger

  • Email outreach

    Outreach sequencing and deliverability tooling.

    Apollo.io

    Apollo.io leads on email outreach (3/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Adapt.ioWeaker
    Apollo.ioStronger

  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    Apollo.io

    Stronger coverage across crm sync, integrations, data export.

    Adapt.ioWeaker
    Apollo.ioStronger

  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Tie

    Adapt.io and Apollo.io are close on value for money (7/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Adapt.io7/10
    Apollo.io7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.