Adapt.io vs Apollo.io
Compare Adapt.io and Apollo.io on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
Adapt.io
Regional B2B contact database with credit plans — Free; Starter $49/mo; Basic $99/mo; Custom contact sales; 7-day trial.
Best for
- • SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
- • Buyers who prefer credit (not seat) packaging and Chrome-led email finding
- • Teams exporting contacts into CRM or SEP tools rather than sequencing in-app
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between Adapt.io and Apollo.io. Choose Adapt.io when SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans. Choose Apollo.io when Outbound and growth sales teams. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.
Adapt.io is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
Apollo.io is better for
- ✓ Contact data
- ✓ Prospecting
- ✓ Email outreach
- ✓ Integrations
Tie
- • Value for money
Choose Adapt.io if: SMB/mid-market teams wanting a regional contact DB peer with published credit plans
Choose Apollo.io if: Outbound and growth sales teams
Apollo.io
Best for
- • Outbound and growth sales teams
- • RevOps teams consolidating data + engagement
- • Buyers who need prospecting more than classic CRM boards
Starting from $49.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
7
Criteria
6
Screenshots
11
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Adapt.io — Official Site | Adapt.io | official-product-page |
| Adapt.io Pricing | Adapt.io | official-pricing-page |
| Adapt.io Product | Adapt.io | official-product-page |
| Adapt.io Pricing | Adapt.io | official-product-page |
| Apollo.io Pricing | Apollo.io | official-pricing-page |
| Apollo.io | Apollo.io | official-product-page |
| Apollo Conversations | Apollo.io | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.