ACT! vs Oracle NetSuite CRM
Compare ACT! and Oracle NetSuite CRM on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.
ACT!
ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).
Best for
- • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
- • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between ACT! and Oracle NetSuite CRM. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
ACT! is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Email capabilities
- ✓ Administration
- ✓ Value for money
Oracle NetSuite CRM is better for
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Reporting
- ✓ Customization
Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
Choose Oracle NetSuite CRM if: CRM embedded in NetSuite’s cloud ERP for mid-market and enterprise finance-operations aligned sales teams.
Oracle NetSuite CRM
Oracle NetSuite CRM module; custom enterprise quote only.
Best for
- • CRM embedded in NetSuite’s cloud ERP for mid-market and enterprise finance-operations aligned sales teams.
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
8
Criteria
10
Screenshots
4
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| ACT! Pricing | ACT! | official-pricing-page |
| ACT! | ACT! | official-product-page |
| ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| ACT! Product (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| Oracle NetSuite CRM Pricing | Oracle NetSuite CRM | official-pricing-page |
| Oracle NetSuite CRM | Oracle NetSuite CRM | official-product-page |
| Oracle NetSuite CRM Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Oracle NetSuite CRM | fixture |
| Oracle NetSuite CRM Product (fixture snapshot) | Oracle NetSuite CRM | fixture |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.