ACT! vs Close
Compare ACT! and Close on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

ACT!
ACT! by Swiftpage SMB CRM; contact sales for current packaging (no invented list prices).
Best for
- • ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
- • Classic SMB CRM for managing contacts, activities, and sales follow-ups — especially familiar to established small businesses.
No free plan
VS
Our verdict
There is no universal winner between ACT! and Close. Choose based on pipeline depth, automation, email and calling, reporting, and pricing trade-offs.
Close is better for
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Pipeline management
- ✓ Sales automation
- ✓ Email capabilities
Tie
- • Value for money
Choose ACT! if: ACT! by Swiftpage — long-standing SMB CRM for contacts, calendars, and sales follow-up; pricing primarily contact-sales
Choose Close if: Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM

Close
Sales-focused CRM for pipeline management and sales engagement workflows.
Best for
- • Outbound sales teams that need a communication-centric CRM
- • Teams that need dialing power and advanced outreach workflows
- • Teams that rely on calling, email, and SMS from the CRM
Starting from $9.00/user/mo
No free plan
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
9
Criteria
10
Screenshots
14
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| ACT! Pricing | ACT! | official-pricing-page |
| ACT! | ACT! | official-product-page |
| ACT! Pricing (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| ACT! Product (fixture snapshot) | ACT! | fixture |
| Close Pricing (fixture snapshot) | Close | fixture |
| Close Product (fixture snapshot) | Close | fixture |
| Close Pricing | Close | official-pricing-page |
| Close CRM | Close | official-product-page |
| Close Features | Close | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.