SoftwareGlimpse

SolarWinds Incident Response vs TOPdesk

Compare SolarWinds Incident Response and TOPdesk on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20267 evidence sources3 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
SolarWinds Incident Response logo

SolarWinds Incident Response

7.7/10

SolarWinds Incident Response (formerly Squadcast) — Pro $15/user/mo annual; Premium $24/user/mo annual; Enterprise contact; 14-day trial. Slug remains squadcast. Does not outrank PagerDuty 8.0.

Best for

  • Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor
  • Buyers comparing SolarWinds Incident Response (Squadcast) to incident.io, FireHydrant, and Rootly
  • Orgs that will spend the 14-day trial before committing

Starting from $15.00/user/mo

No free plan

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

No universal winner. Choose based on which criteria matter most for your team.

SolarWinds Incident Response is better for

  • Starting pricing

TOPdesk is better for

  • Security & admin

Tie

  • Integrations

Choose SolarWinds Incident Response if: Teams that want on-call + incident response with a published Pro $15 annual floor

Choose TOPdesk if: IT teams that want a published GBP agent ITSM SKU rather than a ServiceNow RFP

See detailed comparison ↓
TOPdesk logo

TOPdesk

7.8/10

ITSM / service management — Essential £51/agent/mo; Engaged £72; Excellent £101 (GBP). Does not outrank ServiceNow 8.7 / Freshservice 8.4.

Best for

  • IT teams that want a published GBP agent ITSM SKU rather than a ServiceNow RFP
  • European desks comparing TOPdesk Essential £51 to HaloITSM’s UK calculator
  • Buyers who will model GBP vs Freshservice’s USD $19 Starter before ranking

Starting from $51.00/user/mo

No free plan

Screenshots

Verified product UI captures from research — never stock imagery.

SolarWinds Incident Response

TOPdesk

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.