SoftwareGlimpse

Linear vs Motion

Compare Linear and Motion on features, pricing, and buyer fit using the same researched criteria.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 18, 20264 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Linear logo

Linear

7.9/10

Modern issue tracker for product/engineering teams — Free limited; Basic from ~$8/user/mo annual.

Best for

  • Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
  • Startups replacing Jira complexity
  • Issue-centric software delivery

Starting from $8.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

No universal winner

There is no universal winner between Linear and Motion. Choose Linear when Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX. Choose Motion when Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling. Criterion scores come from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments and first-party research — not hands-on lab testing.

Linear is better for

  • Free plan
  • Ease of use
  • Timeline / Gantt
  • Collaboration

Motion is better for

  • Automations
  • AI features

Choose Linear if: Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX

Choose Motion if: Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling

See detailed comparison ↓
Motion logo

Motion

6.9/10

AI calendar + task auto-scheduling (projects, docs, meetings) — Pro AI from $19/seat/mo annual.

Best for

  • Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling
  • Calendar + task unification
  • Buyers who want AI docs/projects bundled

Starting from $19.00/user/mo

No free plan

Linear vs Motion at a glance

Criterion-level leaders from verified research.

Full scorecard →

Scorecard preview

Criterion leaders based on verified research — open the Scorecard tab for evidence detail.

  • Starting pricingDepends

    Linear

    Motion

  • Seat / licence minimumDepends

    Linear

    Motion

  • Free planLinear

    Linear

    Motion

  • Ease of useLinear

    Linear

    Motion

  • Timeline / GanttLinear

    Linear

    Motion

Which project management is better for you?

Quick picks based on fit — not a universal ranking.

  • Linear

    Best for free plan

    Linear researches a free plan; Motion does not research a free plan.

  • Linear

    Best for ease of use

    Linear leads on ease of use (9/10 vs 8/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Linear

    Best for timeline / gantt

    Linear leads on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Motion

    Best for automations

    Motion leads on automations (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Motion

    Best for ai features

    Motion leads on ai features (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

The biggest differences

Where the products diverge most clearly on verified criteria.

  • Starting pricing

    Depends

    Linear

    Linear researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched; Motion researched starting price from $19/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

    Motion

    Linear researched starting price from $8/mo; a free plan is researched; Motion researched starting price from $19/mo. Seat minimums and AI credits can change TCO.

  • Seat / licence minimum

    Depends

    Linear

    Check paid seat floors for Linear and Motion on current vendor packaging.

    Motion

    Check paid seat floors for Linear and Motion on current vendor packaging.

  • Timeline / Gantt

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on timeline gantt (9/10 vs 7/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Motion

    Trails Linear on this criterion

  • Automations

    Motion wins

    Linear

    Trails Motion on this criterion

    Motion

    Motion leads on automations (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

  • Integrations

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on integrations (8/10 vs 6/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Motion

    Trails Linear on this criterion

  • Reporting

    Linear wins

    Linear

    Linear leads on reporting (7/10 vs 5/10) from approved SoftwareGlimpse editorial assessments — not hands-on lab testing.

    Motion

    Trails Linear on this criterion

Which should you choose?

Choose Linear if

  • Product/engineering teams wanting modern UX
  • Startups replacing Jira complexity
  • Issue-centric software delivery

Choose Motion if

  • Individuals/small teams buying AI auto-scheduling
  • Calendar + task unification
  • Buyers who want AI docs/projects bundled

How we compare

A short look at the comparison process. Full methodology

  1. 1

    Collect

    Collect official product information, pricing, and product evidence.

  2. 2

    Normalize

    Map evidence to the same category evaluation criteria for both products.

  3. 3

    Compare

    Evaluate both products against identical criteria — ties and depends are allowed.

  4. 4

    Explain

    Show why each product wins, loses, or ties, with evidence behind the outcome.

Still deciding between Linear and Motion?

Use Best project management software for a shortlist matched to your priorities, or build another side-by-side comparison.

  • Independent criterion outcomes
  • No invented scores or prices
  • Affiliate links never change winners

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.