SoftwareGlimpse

monday.com vs Hive

Compare Hive and monday.com on starting price, seat minimums, free plans, timelines, automations, integrations, and reporting. There is no universal winner — choose by job-cluster fit.

Independently recommendedLast updated Aug 17, 20265 evidence sources6 screenshotsHow we compare
Compare another
Hive logo

Hive

7.6/10

Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.

Best for

  • SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
  • Buyers comparing monday who want a lower paid floor

Starting from $5.00/user/mo

Free plan available

VS

Our verdict

Our verdict

monday.com is the stronger overall fit

Choose monday.com when mainstream Work OS breadth, ecosystem depth and brand default matter (overall 8.6); choose Hive when a lower paid entry and generous Free (≤10) matter more (overall 7.6). Both are work-OS peers — not timeline specialists or adjacent PDF/remote tools.

Hive is better for

  • Starting pricing
  • Seat / licence minimum
  • Free plan
  • Value for money

monday.com is better for

  • Automations
  • Ease of use
  • Work planning depth
  • Automation & workflows

Tie

  • Timeline / Gantt

Choose Hive if: SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams

Choose monday.com if: Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS

See detailed comparison ↓
Stronger overall fit
monday.com logo

monday.com

8.6/10

Work OS / work management platform with boards, timelines, automations and AI credits — Basic from $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum).

Best for

  • Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
  • Buyers who need deep integrations and timeline/workload views

Starting from $9.00/user/mo

Free plan available

Comparison scorecard

Criterion-by-criterion results for Hive and monday.com. Numeric bars appear only when both products have approved scores.

  • Starting pricing

    Published floor price and what that floor actually includes.

    Hive

    monday.com Basic $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum) plus AI credit bundles; Hive Starter $5/user/mo annual (≤10) or Teams $12 unlimited. Hive undercuts monday’s paid floor for small teams.

    HiveStronger
    monday.comWeaker
  • Seat / licence minimum

    Minimum billed seats and how that changes small-team cost.

    Hive

    monday.com paid plans enforce a 3-seat minimum; Free is ≤2 seats. Hive Free/Starter allow up to 10 members before Teams unlimited — friendlier for micro teams.

    HiveStronger
    monday.comWeaker
  • Free plan

    Whether a usable free plan is published, and what it gates.

    Hive

    Both publish free plans. monday.com Free: ≤2 seats, ≤3 boards. Hive Free: ≤10 members with storage/AI credit caps.

    HiveStronger
    monday.comWeaker
  • Timeline / Gantt

    Native timeline, Gantt, or dependency planning.

    Tie

    Both support timeline/Gantt-style planning on work-management plans. monday.com markets timeline + workload views heavily; Hive covers Gantt/timeline inside projects.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Automations

    Rules, recipes, and workflow automations in the work OS.

    monday.com

    Both ship native automations/workflows. monday.com is the broader published Work OS automation narrative; Hive pairs automations with optional ~$5 add-ons.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Ease of use

    How quickly teams become productive.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on ease of use (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Work planning depth

    Boards, timelines, dependencies, and planning views for the primary job.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on work planning depth (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Automation & workflows

    Automation depth, workflow builders, and action limits.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on automation & workflows (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Collaboration

    Docs, comments, chat, proofing, and guest collaboration quality.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on collaboration (8/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Integrations

    Important third-party integrations.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on integrations (7/10 vs 9/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    monday.com9/10
  • AI features

    Useful AI for the primary job — not marketing fluff.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on ai features (7/10 vs 8/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    monday.com8/10
  • Reporting

    Reporting and forecasting quality.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on reporting (7/10 vs 8/10) from vendor documentation as of the research date — not lab testing.

    Hive7/10
    monday.com8/10
  • Scalability

    Fit as team size and complexity grow.

    monday.com

    monday.com leads on scalability (7/10 vs 9/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive7/10
    monday.com9/10
  • Value for money

    Capability relative to total cost of ownership.

    Hive

    Hive leads on value for money (8/10 vs 7/10) from approved product scores grounded in vendor documentation.

    Hive8/10
    monday.com7/10

Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.

Affiliate disclosure: some links may be affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Rankings and scores are never based on commission. Full disclosure

Methodology disclosure: scores and recommendations follow SoftwareGlimpse evaluation criteria (version 1.0.0). Affiliate relationships do not determine rankings.

How we recommend: product claims are tied to recorded research where available.

AI-assisted disclosure: drafts may be AI-assisted from approved facts and assessments. Humans approve publishable editorial judgments. AI does not invent live prices or claim hands-on testing.