monday.com vs Hive
Compare Hive and monday.com on starting price, seat minimums, free plans, timelines, automations, integrations, and reporting. There is no universal winner — choose by job-cluster fit.
Hive
Work management platform with free plan (≤10 members) and Teams from $12/user/mo annual — strong monday.com peer.
Best for
- • SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
- • Buyers comparing monday who want a lower paid floor
Starting from $5.00/user/mo
Free plan available
VS
Our verdict
Choose monday.com when mainstream Work OS breadth, ecosystem depth and brand default matter (overall 8.6); choose Hive when a lower paid entry and generous Free (≤10) matter more (overall 7.6). Both are work-OS peers — not timeline specialists or adjacent PDF/remote tools.
Hive is better for
- ✓ Starting pricing
- ✓ Seat / licence minimum
- ✓ Free plan
- ✓ Value for money
monday.com is better for
- ✓ Automations
- ✓ Ease of use
- ✓ Work planning depth
- ✓ Automation & workflows
Tie
- • Timeline / Gantt
Choose Hive if: SMB teams starting Free (≤10) before Teams
Choose monday.com if: Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
monday.com
Work OS / work management platform with boards, timelines, automations and AI credits — Basic from $9/seat/mo annual (3-seat minimum).
Best for
- • Teams standardising on a mainstream Work OS
- • Buyers who need deep integrations and timeline/workload views
Starting from $9.00/user/mo
Free plan available
Evidence & transparency
Sources and research process behind this comparison.
Sources
5
Criteria
14
Screenshots
6
Sources consulted
| Title | Product | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Hive — Official Site | Hive | official-product-page |
| Hive Pricing | Hive | official-pricing-page |
| monday.com — Official Site | monday.com | official-product-page |
| monday.com Pricing | monday.com | official-pricing-page |
| monday.com Work Management | monday.com | official-product-page |
Methodology steps
- 1Collect first-party product and pricing evidence
- 2Map both products to the same category criteria
- 3Record criterion outcomes with confidence and sources
- 4Publish only when editorial gates allow indexing
Methodology version 1.0.0.
Affiliate relationships never change comparison outcomes. We evaluate both products on the same criteria and allow ties when evidence does not support a universal winner.
Read full methodology →Some visit links may be affiliate links — we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Comparison outcomes are never based on commission.